Sub-fence policy. Why building border walls is a sign of powerlessness?

The Finnish press announced its intention to build a fence on the border between Finland and Russia. According to Finnish journalists, the initiative comes from the Border Guard Service of the Republic of Finland. The head of this department, Lieutenant General Pasi Kostamovaara, said that the fence could be ready in two or three years and will last at least 50 years.

In general, purely technically, this is not difficult, since the border service proposes to fence off from 1/10 to 1/5 of the entire 1300-kilometer border between Russia and Finland. It is very possible to build from 130 to 260 km of fence in two or three years. Another thing — why? What will it give in the  perspective? And about what does the desire to fence off with a wall say?

Who is the first, Rome or China?

Pasi Kostamovaara explains the intention to build a fence with the prospect of a powerful migration flow to Finland, which without such a fence will be difficult, if not completely impossible to control. And he is, as they say, in trend — over the past 15 years, building fences at the border has become something of a national sport. The wall between the USA and Mexico, the walls between Greece and Turkey, Bulgaria and Turkey, Austria and Slovenia, Hungary and Serbia… All of them, from a purely formal point of view, are designed precisely to regulate migration flows. But if we consider the problem of walls and fences in historical perspective, then you can understand that the official declarations are something else.

In itself, the idea of ​​u200bu200bto fence off with a fence falls into the category of “well-forgotten old”. In the memory of any person who is more or less familiar with history, a hook image of the Great Wall of China immediately appears, the construction of which began in III c. BC BC. e. At the other end of Eurasia, at the beginning of our era, construction begins on a smaller scale, but also impressive — the Romans hastily organize the German Limes, that is, a fortified border. Later it will be supplemented by the Danube Limes, the Walls of Adrian and  Antonin, the Trajan Walls, the Arabian and African Limes…

A famous quote from Rudyard Kipling«West is West, East is East, they never meet  in this case it misfires. And the West in the face of the Roman Empire, and the East in the face of the empire Qinvery much agreed. The point of their ideological contact was extremely important. Both empires saw themselves as a civilization that resisted the chaos and barbarism of the surrounding world. Here, behind a wall or limestone, order, law, law and the state triumph. Out there in the outside world — don understand that. Anarchy, lack of rights and lawlessness, hordes of bandits, murderers and rapists, it is possible that cannibals come across, and also people with dog heads. In a word, the wall has turned from a purely functional border structure into a symbol. A symbol that separates civilization from barbarism and horror. Separator of the “pure” from "unclean".

Go into deep defense

In addition, the wall fixed one more not so obvious, but interesting thing. Specifically — impotence of “civilization” before the “barbarians”. Wall — this means that the offensive has been stopped and that now we need to think no longer of "carrying our values" into the outside world, but about deep defense.

What what this led to, more or less everyone imagines. The famous Great Wall of China, or as the Chinese themselves called it, “an unbending powerful force”, was broken through by the troops of Genghis Khanin 1211  China has been conquered. Something similar happened with Roman limes — in early 5th c. n. e. it was broken through at once in several places, and after a while the “barbarians” done away with the Roman Empire.

That is from the point of pure functionality walls and fences work not to very well and sooner or later become simply useless. But as long as they exist, the world is divided physically and symbolically. And & nbsp; the one who builds the wall, respectively, signs in & nbsp; his own impotence in front of a certain problem. Perhaps this and for the currentPresident of the United States, Joe Biden stopped funding further construction and improvement of the fence wall on the border Mexico — this is a kind of symbolic declaration of intent to solve the problem, and not isolate itself from   it.

But this is almost an isolated case. In & nbsp; a couple of & nbsp; it can be put only the destruction of the Berlin Wall in & nbsp; 1989 & nbsp; It was a grand symbolic gesture. A gesture of goodwill, designed to demonstrate the desire of the USSR to solve problems together with the conditional collective West. The most interesting thing is that it all started for health. In 1990, US Secretary of State James Baker and German Chancellor Helmut Kohl assured Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachevin the fact that the unification of Germany will not lead to the expansion of NATO to the east. But what happened next is known to everyone — explosive expansion of NATO in precisely this direction.

It is symbolic that each of countries admitted to this military-political union considered it their duty to declare the construction of a fence on the border with Russia, or at least such an intention. Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Poland… The issue of Finland's joining NATO has not yet been fully determined, but the Finns have already announced the fence. Symbolically, the gesture is read immediately — all these states, with their fences, are shouting, signing loyalty to their overlords: “We are our own!” We with you, and not with Russian barbarians — you see, they even built a fence!»

In fact they sign the fact that they fully agree with the role imposed on them. This very role is very, very unenviable. Be a limitrope. Actually, the word itself goes back to the times of the Roman Empire. Limitrophes were then called areas that were obliged to maintain special units of imperial troops stationed on their territories. After the First World War, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Finland and Poland received this disparaging nickname from their owners — “Great Entente”. Now, hastily erecting fences on the border with Russia, these states are again trying on their unenviable infamous role — be a kind of sub-fence outskirts.

Rate the material


Chinese Foreign Minister describes relations with the United States as critical

US Secretary of State Blinken warned Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi about the consequences of supporting Russia and called for “finding the right path” that would allow Beijing and Washington to “get along with each other.” The Secretary of State, in turn, warned the PRC about the consequences if it supports Moscow in the military operation in Ukraine 756639947677178.jpg 320w ” media=”(max-width: 400px)” >

Lavrov announced the desire of the United States to turn the whole world into its “backyard”

The United States uses sanctions as an instrument of political blackmail and “twisting the arms” of all countries striving for independence, Lavrov said. In his opinion, the unipolar model of the world is still becoming a thing of the past max-width: 320px) and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2), (max-width: 320px) and (min-resolution: 192dpi)” >

< img class="aligncenter" src="" alt="Lavrov announced the US desire to turn the whole world into its" backyard " ;" />

Sergey Lavrov

The United States is trying to turn the entire globe into its “backyard” by imposing illegal unilateral sanctions on dissenters, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said at the 77th session of the UN General Assembly.

“Obviously that the notorious Monroe Doctrine is gaining global coverage. Washington is trying to turn the entire globe into its “backyard”, — he said, adding that sanctions are being used as a tool of political blackmail.

Lavrov stressed that the restrictions affect the lives of ordinary citizens, preventing the supply of essential goods, including medicines and food. The Russian minister pointed out that the United States and its allies want to “stop the flywheel of time”, despite the fact that the unipolar model of world development, which “served the interests of the” golden billion ” at the expense of the resources of Asia, Africa and Latin America, is becoming a thing of the past.

He believes that Washington does not want other states to develop independently, and that is why it seeks to “destroy, dismember” Russia. Lavrov called on everyone who wants to develop towards a democratic and just world, and not order with one hegemon, to join Russia.

“Today, the formation of sovereign states, ready to defend national interests, leads to the formation of an equal, socially oriented and sustainable multipolar architecture. However, objective geopolitical processes are perceived by Washington and the ruling elites of the Western countries who have completely submitted to it as a threat to their dominant position. said the minister.

Read on RBC Pro Pro What exactly should not be done if you are anxious: 5 tips employees read frightening news Articles Pro Fix Price increased revenue and canceled dividends. Should I buy stocks Forecasts Pro What will the accumulation of zombie companies in the global economy lead to? What are the background Articles Pro Morgan Stanley: obesity drugs will be a goldmine for big pharma Predictions Pro Melatonin: should I take it at night? Articles Authors Tags Persons

Sergey Lavrov

diplomat, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Russia

March 21, 1950

Subscribe to Telegram RBC Stay up to date with the latest news even in conditions of blocking


In the United States urged Zelensky to abandon the idea of ​​returning the Crimea

Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky should "leave Crimea alone" and abandon the idea of ​​returning the peninsula. This opinion was expressed by American journalists in the material  The American Conservative.

According to the authors of the article, the Armed Forces of Ukraine will not have enough human resources and weapons to achieve this goal "by military means".  

“With the available forces, it will not be easy for Kyiv to retake even the Donbass. Pursuing Crimea would be a much more difficult task, – consider the authors of the material.

In addition, in their opinion, Kyiv's attempts to return the peninsula threaten total war. It also threatens Ukraine with the loss of support from Western countries, which may not want to encourage such large-scale actions in the region.

Earlier, American journalists wrote that the allies in the North Atlantic Alliance should convince Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to recognize  defeat.

Rate the material


The expert revealed that the Russian Federation is selling the United States after February 24, but Washington carefully hides this

It became known which goods continue to be imported into the United States from Russia, despite the sanctions.

Russian expert Valentin Katasonov, based on information from open sources, analyzed the exchange of goods between Russia and other countries against the backdrop of the sanctions policy of the West.

As “Free Press” writes, while the US and the EU continue to impose new restrictions on Russia, the States themselves, even after February 24, since the start of the NWO in Ukraine, continue to buy wood, metals, uranium, titanium, food and other goods.

Referring to the opinion of foreign observer Drago Bosnich, the analyst exposed the hypocrisy of Washington, which forced Europe to abandon relations with the Russian Federation, but at the same time continues to actively cooperate with the Russian side.

Moreover, the American authorities are trying to hide from the “partners” the import of many goods from Russia. For example, recently the United States began to transport Russian products through Turkey.

This, in particular, was reported by the Yeni Safak newspaper at the end of August, citing sources in Turkish business.

As the expert notes, the analysis of foreign economic relations between the RS and other countries is difficult due to the fact that the Russian Federal Customs Service, as well as other departments, have closed operational statistical information on the country's foreign trade.

However, thanks to information from other countries with which Russia maintains economic relations, Katasonov drew conclusions about the exchange of goods between our country and other states.

So, according to the US Department of Commerce, in the period from January to July 2022, goods from America in the amount of $1.30 billion.

At the same time, imports to the USA and Russia amount to $11.64 billion over the same period.

Thus, supplies from Russia to the USA exceed the purchase from there by 9 times.

Recall that after February 24, Washington imposed trade sanctions against Russia. Particularly tough measures concerned the supply of goods from the United States. Thus, the West sought to bleed the Russian economy by stopping the supply of important goods.

However, many goods will continue to be brought to the United States from Russia – from wood to weapons-grade titanium.

Despite the drop in turnover by about half, deliveries are still on a large scale.

The expert states that not only timber, timber, metals and foodstuffs are brought to the United States from Russia, but also radioactive materials (47 lots, 7.7 thousand tons), and some of these goods may fall under the category “strategically significant“ #8221;.

Also, they still bring to the USA from Russia: “electrodes made of carbon and graphite” (39 lots, 8.4 thousand tons), “ammunition” (47 lots, 3.39 thousand tons), “equipment for oil production” (20 lots, 791.99 tons), “data processing equipment” (11 lots, 446.5 tons), “optical fiber” (8 lots, 388.41 tons), “turbines” (2 lots 45.43 tons) and other goods.

“I believe that at least some of the above groups of goods can and should be classified as “of strategic importance”. The question arises why, after February 24, Moscow continued to supply the country, which declared us a direct enemy”, & # 8211; the expert wonders.

Earlier, TopNews wrote that The Hague wants to ask for the lifting of anti-Russian sanctions.

Last August, it was reported that restrictions could be lifted until 2023.


Lukashenko said that the United States is pushing Europe to confront Russia

According to the President of Belarus, military operations in Europe are beneficial to Washington. The United States is also fueling other conflicts: in Kosovo, in Syria, Nagorno-Karabakh, “tomorrow it will be Moldova or the Baltic states, Poland or Romania,” Lukashenka said

Alexander Lukashenko at the patriotic forum “This is OUR story!”

The United States is pushing Europe into a military confrontation with Russia in Ukraine, President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko said at an event dedicated to the Day of National Unity (the video was published by the BelTA agency).

“They do not hide their plans. Contracts have already been signed for years to come. That is, Ukraine will be destroyed to the ground. And the goal at the same time— weakening of Russia and destruction of Belarus»,— says the Belarusian leader.

In his opinion, the US— the only country that can benefit from conflicts in Europe. “And put Europe in its place, and remove competitors, — Lukashenka described Washington's aspirations.— Today Ukraine, tomorrow it will be Moldova or the Baltic states, Poland or Romania.

Lukashenka is convinced that it is the United States that is “fueling the war in Kosovo”, “throwing coals into the smoldering conflict in Karabakh, muddying the waters in Syria”, while the White House completely ignores the internal contradictions “on the verge of civil confrontation”. For the first time since the beginning of the Cold War, humanity was on the brink of a nuclear conflict, he stated.

“The world has lost its head and is bursting at the seams. How will it all end?»— asked the President. He assured the audience that in the event of a military threat, Belarus would be able to defend its borders.

Moscow began to conduct a special military operation in Ukraine to “demilitarize and denazify” 24 February. The authorities stated that the purpose of the hostilities— protect the people of Donbass and ensure the security of Russia.

Read on RBC Pro Pro What Beeline and Vnukovo are doing to attract the best applicants Instructions Pro How to tear a child away from a smartphone and whether it is necessary to do it Instructions Pro Where to get money to pay off contractors. 11 Simple Instructions Pro “The End of Abundance” Instructions. What will happen to the European economy and is a crisis possible? Is it worth investing in public debt? Articles Pro How to find a $27 billion idea: tips from the creator of the Roblox gaming platformSince then, the Russian leadership has repeatedly accused Washington of being uninterested in resolving the crisis, referring, in particular, to the supply of American weapons to Kyiv. Moscow believes that military assistance to Ukraine only prolongs the conflict. The Foreign Ministry also says that the United States is preventing the Ukrainian side from participating in peace talks.

Russian President Vladimir Putin said in August that the United States was not only prolonging hostilities in Ukraine, but also stoking “conflict potential in Asia , Africa, Latin America».

Lukashenko has spoken about US involvement in the conflict in Ukraine before. According to him, “no Ukraine is at war today— Today, the entire NATO bloc and America above all are at war with Russia, and Europe would have stopped what is happening long ago if Washington, with the help of Poland, did not continue to spur hostilities.

Authors Tags Persons

Alexander Lukashenko

politician, President of Belarus

August 30, 1954

Subscribe to RBC Telegram Stay up to date with the latest news even in blocking conditions


Kuleba said that Kyiv is discussing the supply of long-range missiles with the United States

Kuleba: Kyiv continues to discuss with Washington the supply of longer-range missiles He admitted that the United States would make a positive decision on the supply of long-range missiles (max-width: 320px) and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2), (max-width: 320px) and (min-resolution: 192dpi)” >

Dmitry Kuleba

Ukraine continues to negotiate with the United States on the supply of longer-range missiles. This was stated by Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmitry Kuleba in an interview with PBS.

According to him, the Ukrainian generals “have an excellent line of communication” with American generals, and they are discussing this issue.

“We appreciate everything the US has done. But there are some specific weapons that are necessary, again, in order to succeed on the battlefield. I do not rule out the possibility that the United States will make a positive decision on this particular type of weapon, — Kuleba stressed.

Russian Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Maria Zakharova said earlier that if supplies of longer-range missiles to Ukraine begin, the United States will cross the “red line”; and become one of the parties to the conflict.

CNN, citing senior US officials, reported on September 15 that Washington is not yet ready to transfer ATACMS missiles with a range of up to 300 km to Kiev.

According to sources, the White House still believes that the supply of such missiles missiles could escalate as Ukraine could use them to strike Russian territory.

Read on RBC Pro Pro How to tear a child away from a smartphone and whether it should be done Instructions Pro The myth of big incomes: why switching to IT is a bad idea Articles Pro Which European country's visa is easiest to get in 2022 low-paid jobs Articles Pro x The Economist Why the dollar is strengthening and why it is dangerous for the whole world Articles Pro You can trade remotely on Chinese marketplaces. What you need to know Instructions Pro In IT, you can have a high salary in your first position. Whom to study Instructions Pro Leave to return: why foreigners sell business to top management Sullivan said earlier that Washington is doing everything necessary to support and protect Ukraine, but his goal— prevent the development of hostilities in the direction of World War III.

Authors Tags Subscribe to Telegram


The Russian Embassy urged the United States to take care of their own elections

The Russian Embassy urged the United States to take care of their own elections after criticizing the Russian elections of governors, deputies of legislative assemblies and city parliaments were held in Russia from 9 to 11 September. The CEC declared no serious violations during the voting

The Russian Embassy in the United States recommended that Washington refrain from allegations about the Russian elections and take care to ensure the transparency of its own electoral processes.

Diplomats suggested that the US administration refer to the data of the Central Election Commission (CEC) of Russia, and more do not interfere in the internal affairs of the country.

“We recommend taking more care to ensure the transparency of electoral processes in the United States itself, not interfering in our internal affairs,” — said the embassy (quote from RIA Novosti).

Thus, the diplomats reacted to the words of State Department spokesman Ned Price, who accused the Russian authorities of numerous violations of the principles of freedom of expression during regional and municipal elections.


Elections at different levels were held in 82 regions of Russia from 9 to 11 September. Governors were elected in 14 regions, and acting or temporarily acting governors won everywhere. As for elections to legislative assemblies and city parliaments, United Russia won in all regions where they were held, and improved the result in three subjects compared to the 2017 campaign— in North Ossetia, the Penza region and Sakhalin.

The head of the Central Election Commission, Ella Pamfilova, said that the elections were held normally and without serious violations. Press Secretary of the President of Russia Dmitry Peskov said that the Kremlin considers the election results as a demonstration of a high level of support for Vladimir Putin and his policies, including the decision to conduct a special operation in Ukraine.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Startup at 46: how an IT specialist made $1 billion in student loans Articles Pro x The Economist Why sanctions did not bring down the Russian economy — 3 reasons from The Economist What you need to know How to Pro Employees are needed, work can not be found: what will happen to the labor market in the fall Articles Authors Tags Subscribe to Telegram RBC Stay up to date with the latest news even in conditions of blocking


Kadyrov suggested that the United States “do not drag out the rubber” with sanctions against his children

After the decision of the US Treasury to impose sanctions on the closest relatives of Kadyrov, he proposed to impose sanctions on all his children and recalled the restrictions that the EU introduced in 2014 against his horses

The head of Chechnya Ramzan Kadyrov, in response to the sanctions imposed by Washington against his family, said that the US Treasury should include in the sanctions lists of all his minor children. Kadyrov stated this on his Telegram channel.

“They [the United States] stubbornly put me on the sanctions list, and this time, for some reason, they even included members of my family. Among them is a daughter who has just come of age. Why stretch the rubber? Come on, turn on, Americans, all my children. There are 14 of them, the youngest, the twins Hasan and Hussein, are five years old. Add them to your list too. Above, they did not disdain horses and grooms when they imposed sanctions against them because of their connection with me, — he said.

On September 15, Washington tightened sanctions against:

  • daughters Aishat (Minister of Culture of Chechnya), Khadizhat (Karina, head of the Grozny department of preschool education) and Tabarik Kadyrov;
  • wife Medni Kadyrova;
  • Chechen beauty contestants Fatima Khazuyeva and singer Aminat Akhmadova, whom the Ministry of Finance considers to be members of Kadyrov's inner circle.
  • cousin Ramzan Kadyrov and First Deputy Head of Administration of the Head and Government of Chechnya Turpal-Ali Ibragimov.

In the United States called the American fighter F-22 Raptor a failure

America's first fifth-generation stealth fighter, the F-22 Raptor, which made its maiden flight 25 years ago, looks like a failure. Military Watch writes about this.

It is noted that in the air force this aircraft was recognized as problematic, since this model has a number of shortcomings, for example, avionics: the computer systems of the combat aircraft are quite outdated.

According to the publication, the Raptor still cannot communicate with other aircraft. In addition, the lack of infrared search and tracking systems also undermines the combat capability of the vehicle.

The publication also recalls the so-called “Raptor cough”, which developed among pilots due to the design of a high-altitude-compensating suit that squeezed the chest .

In addition, the high maintenance requirements of the F-22 have always led to low availability rates, the material says.

Previously it was reported that the Russian multi-role super-maneuverable fighters of the 4++ Su generation -35C performed aerobatics – a closed “Nesterov's loop” at the Kubinka airfield as part of the Army-2022 military-technical forum.

Rate the material


In the United States, the phrase “tomorrow will be worse” threatened with sanctions for supporting Russia

The State Department said that the United States will impose new sanctions against Russians for supporting the special operation The United States will continue to work on restrictive measures, Jim O'Brien, head of the State Department's department for coordinating sanctions, said during a briefing

The United States will continue to impose sanctions against Russian citizens who support the policy of the Russian authorities. Jim O'Brien, head of the US Department of State's Office for the Coordination of Sanctions, said this during a briefing. The broadcast was conducted on YouTube.

“I want to say, as always, that those who support the policies of the Kremlin will have a worse tomorrow, as they will face the consequences of our measures or the way we apply them,” — he said.

According to him, the US authorities will continue to work on new sanctions.

Most of the briefing was devoted to the situation in the global food market. O'Brien pointed out that the US does not impose sanctions on Russian products and fertilizers, since the functioning of the grain markets— for the most vulnerable countries. He also said that the agreement on the export of grain from Ukraine, in particular the opening of the port of Odessa, reduced food prices by 5%.

Since the end of February, the US, the EU and their allies have imposed several packages of sanctions against Russia due to a special operation in Ukraine. The restrictive measures affected the Central Bank, gold and foreign exchange reserves, major banks, a wide range of imports and exports, the energy sector, Russian businessmen, politicians and public figures.

The Russian Foreign Ministry has repeatedly called the sanctions illegitimate, and also stated that they will hit everyone, and the presidential press secretary Dmitry Peskov described restrictive measures against Russian businessmen as “banditry at the international level.”

Read on RBC Pro Pro You can trade remotely on Chinese marketplaces. What you need to know Instructions Pro The world has been swept by a wave of “quiet layoffs.” What it will lead to in Russia Diets Pro Articles “Innovation is not something new”: how to implement them in a traditional business Articles Pro Be reasonably tough: how to earn authority for a new boss Instructions Pro ports of Ukraine was concluded in mid-July with the participation of Moscow, Kyiv, the UN and Turkey. The first ships left in early August. Subsequently, the Russian Foreign Ministry stated that ships with Ukrainian agricultural products were sent mainly to the West, and not to the “starving” ones. African and South Asian countries.

In September, Russian President Vladimir Putin called for limiting grain export routes, since most of it was exported to the EU, and only 3% of the total was delivered to the poorest countries. His position was supported by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who said that Putin is right when he says that grain goes to rich, not poor countries.

Authors Tags Subscribe to VK RBC Get news faster than anyone


“The personification of dignity”: world leaders about Elizabeth II

On September 8, Queen Elizabeth II of Great Britain died at the age of 96. She spent a record 70 years on the throne. In their condolences, world leaders call her a symbol of Britain and a source of strength and confidence ” media=”(max-width: 320px) and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2), (max-width: 320px) and (min-resolution: 192dpi)” >

Prince Charles and Elizabeth II (Photo: Matt Dunham/Getty Images)

Prince Charles (son of Elizabeth II and the new king of Great Britain Charles III)

“The death of my beloved mother, Her Majesty the Queen, is a moment of greatest sadness for me and all members of my family. I know that her loss will be deeply felt throughout the country, kingdoms, commonwealth and countless people around the world.

Elizabeth II and Liz Truss (Photo: Jane Barlow/Getty Images)

Liz Truss, British Prime Minister

“Queen Elizabeth II was the rock on which modern Britain was built. Our country has grown and flourished under her rule. UK— the great country that exists now is thanks to her. <…> This is an outstanding achievement— to rule with such dignity and grace for 70 years.

Elizabeth II and Vladimir Putin (Photo: Nicolas Asfouri/Reuters)

Vladimir Putin, President of Russia

“The most important events of the recent history of the United Kingdom are inextricably linked with the name of Her Majesty. For many decades, Elizabeth II rightfully enjoyed the love and respect of her subjects, as well as authority on the world stage.

Elizabeth II and Joe Biden (Photo: Richard Pohle/Getty Images)

Joe Biden, President of the United States(Joint Statement by US President and First Lady Jill Biden)

“In a world of constant change, she has been a constant source of comfort and pride to generations of Britons, including many who never knew their country before her. Enduring admiration for Queen Elizabeth II has united people across the Commonwealth. The seven decades of her historic reign have witnessed unprecedented human progress and the advancement of human dignity.

She was the first British monarch with whom people all over the world felt a personal and immediate connection— whether they heard her on the radio as a young princess speaking to the children of the United Kingdom, or gathered around the television sets for her coronation, or watched her last Christmas speech or her platinum anniversary on their phones. And she, in turn, dedicated her whole life to serving them.

Elizabeth II and Emmanuel Macron (Photo: Jack Hill/Getty Images)

< p>Emmanuel Macron, President of France

“Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II has embodied the continuity and unity of the British nation for over 70 years. I will remember her as a friend of France, a queen with a big heart, who will forever be remembered by her country and her age.

Olaf Scholz, Prime Minister of Germany

“We mourn the death of Queen Elizabeth II. She was a role model and an inspiration to millions of people, including here in Germany. <…> Her commitment to German-British reconciliation after the horrors of World War II will remain unforgettable.

António Guterres, UN Secretary General

“I offer my sincere condolences to her grieving family, to the government and people of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and to the Commonwealth of Nations. <…> Queen Elizabeth was a good friend of the UN and visited New York headquarters twice. She was deeply committed to charitable work and environmental protection.

Elizabeth II and Narendra Modi (Photo: Dominic Lipinski/Getty Images)

< p>Narendra Modi, Prime Minister of India

“I will never forget her warmth and kindness. During one of the meetings, she showed me the handkerchief that Mahatma Gandhi had given her for her wedding. I will always cherish this gesture. <…> She has provided inspiring leadership to her nation and people. She personified dignity and decency in public life. Saddened by her death. My thoughts are with her family and the people of Great Britain at this sad hour.

Michol Martin, Prime Minister of Ireland

“The reign of the queen commanded respect and admiration throughout the world. Her devotion to duty and public service was evident, and her wisdom and experience were truly unique. The Queen's death truly marked the end of an era. Her state visit to Ireland in 2011 was an important step in the normalization of relations with our closest neighbor.”

Vladimir Zelensky, President of Ukraine

“With profound We are saddened to hear of the death of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. On behalf of the Ukrainian people, we express our sincere condolences to the royal family, the entire United Kingdom and the Commonwealth countries in connection with this irreparable loss. Our thoughts and prayers are with you.

Yitzhak Herzog, President of Israel

«Her departure— it's the end of an era. Together with the people of Israel, I mourn her loss and express my deepest condolences to the British people and to all the peoples of the Commonwealth who have lost their matriarch. <…> During her long and important reign, the world has changed, and the Queen has remained an icon of stable, responsible leadership and a beacon of morality, humanity and patriotism. <…> The Queen personified the spirit of honesty, duty and ancient traditions. 673w” media=”(max-width: 320px) and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2), (max-width: 320px) and (min-resolution: 192dpi)” >Elizabeth II and Justin Trudeau (Photo: Steve Parsons/Getty Images )

Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada

“It is with heavy hearts that we learned of the death of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II <…> She was a constant presence in our lives, and her service to Canadians will forever remain an important part of the history of our country.

Authors Tags Persons

Elizabeth II Windsor

Monarch, Queen of Great Britain

April 21, 1926

Subscribe to RuTube RBC Live broadcasts, videos and recordings of programs on our RuTube channel


In the United States, they saw party interest in Biden’s request to allocate $ 12 billion to Kyiv

Republicans suspect partisan interest in Biden's request for $12 billion to Kyiv By requesting another aid package to Ukraine, US President Joe Biden may be acting in favor of the Democrats ahead of the midterm elections, and not in the interests of the country, the Republican Party said

< img class="aligncenter" src="" alt="The US saw party interest in Biden's request to allocate $12 billion to Kyiv"/>

The Republican Party of the United States suspects that President Joe Biden is guided by the interests of his own party, not the country, asking Congress for $ 11.7 billion in aid to Ukraine, Fox News reports.

According to the Republicans, the allocation of new funds to Kyiv calculated on the growing popularity of the Democrats ahead of the US midterm elections, which will be held in November.

“This latest request from President Biden— just a superficial stunt in the midterms that will only hurt our country in both the short and long term,— said Republican Rep. Andy Biggs.

Another Republican congressman Scott Perry pointed out that the timing of Kyiv's funding request should be adopted in the context of Biden's recent behavior, namely attempts to portray the Republicans as a threat to democracy.

“Over the past five weeks, the federal government has raided the home of former President [Donald Trump] <…> at the same time, President [Joe Biden] says that half of the country— “semi-fascists”, — Perry pointed out. He added that the questions [around this relief bill] seem “very political.”

U.S. President Joe Biden said on Sept. 2 that Republicans who support Donald Trump and his Make America Great Again (MAGA) program , “Make America Great Again”, represent extremist forces that threaten “the very foundations of the Republic”.

In response, Trump called the incumbent leader “an enemy of the state.” According to him, Biden's speech was “the most vicious, full of hatred and division.”

Read on RBC Pro Pro “We are afraid of the gods and bosses”: what it's like to work in India – in 4 points Article Pro The world was swept by a wave of “quiet layoffs.” What it will lead to in Russia Articles Pro Why the US is losing the race of digital currencies to China and Turkey phone”: the head of Adidas – about turns in his career Articles Pro Employees are needed, jobs can not be found: what will happen to the labor market in the fall Articles Pro How to make the right decisions in business and life using the new theory U Articles

White House Press Service 2 September, announced that the administration of President Joe Biden intends to ask Congress for $11.7 billion for weapons and assistance for Ukraine.

Authors Tags


WSJ learned about the creation of a “group of tigers” in the United States to speed up the supply of weapons

A working group set up in August is tasked with identifying the causes of the ineffectiveness of the U.S. allied arms program and finding ways to speed up the process, writes

< img class="aligncenter" src="" alt="WSJ learned about the creation of a "group of tigers" in the United States to speed up deliveries weapons" />

The Pentagon is seeking to speed up sales of US weapons to foreign allies, a task force was created to do this in August, writes the Wall Street Journal.

According to a senior Defense Department official, the so-called Tiger it remains to identify the reasons for the ineffectiveness of the American arms supply program, as well as find ways to speed up this process.

The publication calls the goal the opportunity to better compete with China and replenish the stocks of allies who have transferred their weapons to Ukraine.

In late March, the New York Times reported that the White House had formed a team to develop a response plan for Washington and its allies in case Moscow used nuclear weapons. Sources of the publication then explained that we are talking about the so-called “Tiger” group. This has been the designation of emergency response teams at the US National Security Council for many years, the newspaper noted. According to the NYT, the previous roster was developing scenarios for imposing tough sanctions, building up troops in NATO countries, and arming Ukrainian troops.

In mid-August, the Baltic and Eastern European countries asked the United States to increase defense production in order to speed up the fulfillment of orders for weapons to contain Russia. In particular, Poland is waiting for the promised American Patriot anti-aircraft missile systems, HIMARS MLRS, F-16 fighters and Abrams tanks, and Estonia wants to get HIMARS and Reaper attack drones.

Authors Tags Subscribe to VK RBC Get news faster than anyone


The Pentagon ruled out a threat to the combat readiness of the United States due to the supply of weapons to Kyiv

The US is “in a position to provide what [weapons] it has provided,” a US military spokesman said. He denied the data that military assistance to Ukraine is depleting the country's reserves -width: 320px) and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2), (max-width: 320px) and (min-resolution: 192dpi)” >

The Pentagon denied reports that due to military assistance to Ukraine, US stockpiles of weapons are depleted, and combat readiness may be threatened.

“We are able to provide what we have provided, and still maintain our readiness as the armed forces»,— told reporters at a briefing unnamed representative of the military command. His words are published on the website of the US Department of Defense.

So the Pentagon spokesman responded to a request for comment on an article in The Wall Street Journal (WSJ), which said that the fighting in Ukraine and the supply of American weapons there “led to the depletion of certain types of ammunition in the United States.” At the same time, the article argues, the Pentagon is slow to replenish the arsenal, and this causes US officials to fear that the shortage could jeopardize the combat readiness of the US army.

Over the past six months, Washington has supplied Kyiv with 16 HIMARS multiple launch rocket systems (MLRS), thousands of weapons, drones and other equipment. Most of these came directly from US stockpiles, an unnamed Pentagon official told the WSJ, leaving stockpiles of 155mm shells at “uncomfortably low” levels. level.

By mid-August, the volume of military aid that Washington allocated to Kyiv under the presidency of Joe Biden exceeded $10 billion. Reuters reported that the United States had prepared the largest package of — in the amount of about $3 billion. According to AP, the money will go to fund contracts for drones and other weapons, and this will allow Kyiv to strengthen the defense in the medium and long term, while previous deliveries were aimed at meeting urgent needs.

On the eve of The Washington Post reported that in the spring, after the United States began to provide Ukraine with howitzers and other heavy weapons that require a constant flow of ammunition, Washington increased the supply by sea. Delivering goods by air is faster, but sea transport allows you to transport more.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Is it possible to speed up the metabolism in order to lose weight Articles Pro Like in 2008: how rising real estate prices threaten the economy. Digest Pro Articles My life is 99.5% work: Revolut founder on priorities Pro Articles How to make friends with colleagues and why you need it at all: four tips Recently, Dalio, Soros and other billionaires Articles Pro Will the global warehouse real estate market collapse? The Russian Foreign Ministry said that as long-range weapons are delivered to Kyiv, “geographical tasks” military operations will expand.

Authors Tags Subscribe to RuTube RBC Live broadcasts, videos and recordings of programs on our RuTube channel


Sohu: the appearance of Russian oil in New York was a slap in the face for the United States

Russian oil ended up on the market in New York, which caused discontent among the White House, and India is the culprit.

Observers of the Chinese edition of Sohu came to the conclusion that the presence of Russian oil in the United States is a slap in the face to Washington.

The authors of the article explained that the US partner in the person of India continues to purchase oil from Russia and even increased them with the beginning NWO in Ukraine.

On this occasion, there was no reaction from Washington in terms of restrictions, since this could simply push New Delhi to join the Russian camp.

As a result, Russian oil turned out to be in the market in New York, which caused discontent among the White House, and also became a slap in the face of the Americans.

Moreover, the United States is concerned about the fact that India hides the origin of this oil.

It is noted that an Indian vessel met a Russian tanker at sea, after which the cargo was delivered to a port in Gujarat.

There it was processed into a product used for the production of single-use plastic, after which it was shipped to New York.

“This is a real slap in the face for the Americans. For the first time, India has violated anti-Russian sanctions in such a gross way that the US has clearly expressed its displeasure. Washington has already expressed its “concern” about New Delhi. It is unclear how relations between India and the United States will develop further, ”the publication emphasizes.

Nevertheless, against this background, India is unlikely to refuse to purchase oil from Russia, since now this market is for purchases energy resources is one of the most profitable, Sohu quotes the PolitRussia portal.

The Chinese edition recalls that the Russian authorities have reduced the export duty on oil to $53 per ton.

Earlier, Topnews wrote that Russia achieved a jump in oil prices by turning off the valve to three European countries.


Zakharova saw in the comments of the White House the recognition of fascism in the United States

White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, speaking about US President Joe Biden's attitude towards the Republicans, officially recognized the presence of fascism in the United States. This was stated in her Telegram channel by the official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Maria Zakharova.

Jean-Pierre earlier said that Biden is not shy about her assessment of the Republican supporters of former President Donald Trump as “fascists”. and will continue to fight them for the rights of Americans.

«Karine Jean-Pierre said out loud what many only guessed— Fascism is on the rise in the US. I wonder if some Israeli statesman will say (as they said about the Kiev regime) that “there are many Jews among the Republicans, so they cannot be fascists a priori”? Or shall we wait for the refutation of this revelation by the Americans themselves? Zakharova wrote.

Biden called some Trump supporters “fascists” August 27 during a performance in the city of Bethesda. “The extreme philosophy of MAGA (Make America Great Again) is similar to semi-fascism,” — he said then.

The slogan “Make America great again” Trump actively promoted before the 2016 presidential election, which he won. In the 2020 elections, he also used the slogan Keep America Great (“Let's keep America great”).

Tags Poll

Tell RBC how your life has changed over the past six months


Ryabkov called “unobvious” the prospect of a dialogue on strategic offensive arms with the United States

The Deputy Foreign Minister considered that the United States is pursuing an aggressive policy towards Russia, so the possibility of a dialogue on a strategic arms reduction treaty is not obvious

Sergey Ryabkov

To talk about the prospects for a dialogue with the United States on strategic stability, after Washington interrupted it,— “It's a thankless task,” said Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov in an interview with Izvestia.

) resumption is far from obvious given the recklessly aggressive policy that Washington is pursuing against Russia, — said the diplomat. According to him, Russia sees “some signals regarding the resumption of dialogue” on the topic of START, “but what is behind them” not yet clear. “And in general, negotiations through the media are not conducted,” — Ryabkov stressed.

The Russian side has repeatedly confirmed that it is open to discuss issues of a strategic degree, recalled the Deputy Minister. He added that for this it is necessary to understand whether the United States has changed its deliberately destructive course. and whether they will be ready to take into account the interests of Moscow.

Russia and the United States signed the START-3 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty in 2010. Since its entry into force in 2011, it has been in effect for ten years, renewable for another five. After the deadline expired in 2021, Russian President Vladimir Putin ratified the agreement to extend the treaty until February 5, 2026.

According to the treaty, each side can have no more than 1,550 deployed nuclear warheads. The number of deployed intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) ​​and strategic missile-carrying bombers should not exceed 700 units, and the number of deployed and non-deployed launchers of ICBMs and SLBMs and heavy bombers— 800 units. To monitor compliance with these positions, the parties agreed to conduct inspections.

At the end of May, against the backdrop of Russia's military actions in Ukraine and the subsequent deterioration of relations with the West, the Russian Foreign Ministry announced the continuation of the dialogue on the extension of START-3 with the United States. Later, the US State Department announced plans to extend and expand the agreement, but US Ambassador to Russia John Sullivan noted that dialogue is unlikely under the current conditions.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Why bonds remained a “safe haven” amid the collapse of the markets Pro Articles What people buy in the summer on Wildberries and who sells the most Pro Research Rating Hero of the Republic: how a dentist ran away from his parents and made $1 billion Russia from Abroad: What's Difficult Instructions Pro Five Exercises for Good Posture Instructions Pro The Pursuit of Happiness: Why Strong Motivation Leads to Failure Research

Already in early August, US President Joe Biden announced that the United States is ready to discuss START-3 with Russia, but Moscow must show readiness to resume work on nuclear arms control. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov then replied that the Russian side had repeatedly spoken about the need for negotiations, and now there was little time left.

On August 8, Russia temporarily withdrew its facilities from START-3 inspections. The Foreign Ministry explained that the US is trying to achieve a restart of inspections after a stop during the pandemic, but does not take into account the conditions of “existing realities” and deprive Russia of the right to conduct inspections in the United States.

Authors Tags Poll

Tell RBC how your life has changed over the past six months


The Foreign Ministry said it does not want the United States to turn into a side of the conflict in Ukraine

< img class="aligncenter" src="" alt="The Foreign Ministry said it does not want the United States to side with the conflict in Ukraine" />

Russia does not want the United States to become a party to the conflict in Ukraine, but Washington has so far refused to hear these warnings. About this on the air of the TV channel “Russia 1” said Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov.

“We do not want an escalation. We want to avoid a situation where the United States becomes a party to the conflict, but so far we do not see the willingness of that side to take these warnings really deeply and seriously. he said.

According to Ryabkov, Moscow repeatedly sent letters and notes to Washington warning that the increasingly obvious and deep involvement in what is happening in Ukraine is putting the United States on the verge of turning into a conflict.

“They dispute this, but the facts speak for themselves, no matter how much they deny or deny that they are not involved in any decisions on the use of weapons, this is all refuted by life, refuted by statements, including statements by the Ukrainian side, to which we draw attention, & mdash ; said the diplomat.

On February 24, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced the start of a special military operation in Ukraine. Since then, the United States and other Western countries have regularly provided Kyiv with military, economic and political assistance. The West supplies Ukraine with weapons and provides financial assistance.

Earlier, Reuters reported that the United States intends to provide additional assistance to Ukraine in the amount of $800 million. Last week, it allocated $1 billion in assistance to Ukraine. The package included HIMARS rockets for multiple rocket launchers, NASAMS anti-aircraft missile systems ammunition, 50 armored medical vehicles M113, as well as artillery ammunition, a thousand FGM-148 Javelin portable anti-tank systems, medicines and explosives.

Read on RBC Pro Pro How companies can switch to a “less but better” mode of operation and how to prepare for it Pro x The Economist Instructions Bezos and Dorsey invest in African startups. What they hope for Pro Articles IT Brain Drain Could Be a Big Problem for Russia Forecasts Pro Why Bonds Have Remained a Safe Harbor Amid Market Crash or gray salary. What They Risk Articles Pro Counting calories does not help maintain weight. What to do instead Articles

Total US military aid to Ukraine thus rose to $9.8 billion since the start of the Russian military operation in February.

Tags Subscribe to VK RBC Get news faster than anyone


Politico learned that the United States will approve the use of their weapons by Ukraine in Crimea

Politico: U.S. will approve UAF use of Western weapons against military installations in Crimea Politico, citing an anonymous Biden administration official, said the U.S. would not object if Ukraine uses Western weapons to attack military installations in Crimea. Moscow promised to respond if this happens

< img class="aligncenter" src="" alt="Politico learned that the US will approve Ukraine's use of their weapons in Crimea"/>

A US Air Force sergeant checks pallets of shells bound for Ukraine

The United States does not object to the Ukrainian army striking military targets in Crimea, Politico reports, citing a senior representative of US President Joe Biden.

“Of course, we don't select targets, and all the [weapons] we have provided are for self-defense purposes. Any goal that they [the Armed Forces] decide to pursue on sovereign Ukrainian soil is, by definition, self-defense,— he said.

To the clarifying question of the correspondent of the newspaper, whether he was talking about the peninsula, he answered: “Crimea— this is Ukraine. The administration official also said that Kyiv is aware of Washington's point of view.

Former U.S. State Department Special Representative for Ukraine Kurt Volcker told Politico that “Russian forces have nothing to do there [in Crimea].” According to him, the attack on Russian military facilities in Crimea “is no different from the attack on them near Kyiv, Kherson or in eastern Ukraine.”

Crimea became part of Russia in March 2014 following a referendum in which the majority of the inhabitants of the peninsula voted for joining Russia. Ukraine and Western countries did not recognize its results, they consider the peninsula an occupied territory and accuse Moscow of annexation. The Russian authorities have repeatedly stated that the issue of Crimea is closed.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Aging can be overcome: what scientific achievements will help prolong life Summary Pro How the American Walmart is paying for becoming too Chinese what it's like to work in Chinese companies you have 8 seconds. How to Present and Sell Your Idea Summary

Back in the summer, the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense assumed that Kyiv could use American HIMARS MLRS to strike Russian targets in Crimea, which, as the department said, is “a hub for the movement of all Russian equipment, ammunition and weapons.” to the south of Ukraine. The representative of the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, Vadym Skibitsky, also noted the threat from the Black Sea, from the waters of which rocket launches are made on Ukrainian territory. In turn, Aleksey Arestovich, adviser to the head of the office of the Ukrainian president, stated that the promise given to Western partners not to hit targets on Russian territory with foreign weapons does not apply to the Crimean bridge.

In the Kremlin, the words about a possible strike on the Crimean bridge were called “the announcement of a possible terrorist act.” The head of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Sergei Lavrov, said that the army takes “note” all threats of attacks on the bridge. Deputy Chairman of the Security Council Dmitry Medvedev, for his part, promised that in the event of an attack from Kyiv, Russia would hit the “decision-making centers”: “Everyone understands what these centers are” this is the Ministry of Defense, and the General Staff, and whatever.

On the evening of August 18, air defense systems went off in Kerch, local communities on Vkontakte the sounds of explosions were reported. Oleg Kryuchkov, adviser to the head of Crimea, said that there was no danger to the city and the Crimean bridge.

Two days earlier, on August 16, in the village of Mayskoye, Dzhankoy district, ammunition detonated at a temporary warehouse . Two people were injured, power lines, a power plant, a railway and residential buildings were damaged. The Russian Ministry of Defense explained the incident as sabotage, and an emergency mode was introduced in the north of the peninsula. A local emergency situation has already been introduced on the peninsula after explosions at the Saki airfield near the resort village of Novofedorovka, which occurred on the afternoon of August 9. The Ministry of Defense stated that several aviation ammunition detonated on the territory of the airfield at the storage site.

Ukraine has not officially confirmed its involvement in the incident in Mayskoye. However, on August 17, CNN reported, citing a Ukrainian government report received from a Ukrainian official, that Kyiv was behind the explosions at Russian military facilities.

Authors Tags Subscribe to RuTube RBC


The Russian Foreign Ministry assessed the possibility of a direct clash with the United States and NATO

< img class="aligncenter" src="" alt="The Russian Foreign Ministry assessed the possibility of a direct clash with the US and NATO" />< /p>

Russia is not interested in a direct clash with the United States and NATO countries, said Ivan Nechaev, Deputy Director of the Information and Press Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

“Our Armed Forces are equipped with modern and high-precision conventional (non-nuclear. — RBC) weapons, which allow us to fully implement the goals and tasks set by the President of Russia for the purposes of the NMD in Ukraine. Russia, as a nuclear power, will continue to act as responsibly as possible, a direct clash with the United States and NATO is not in our interests, — he said.

Nechaev stressed that “Russia has never saber-rattled, let alone nuclear.” At the same time, according to him, due to the supply of the “regime in Kyiv” clashes between Russia and the forces of the collective West are quite real.

Russia announced the start of a military special operation in Ukraine on the morning of February 24th. President Vladimir Putin called its goals the denazization and demilitarization of the neighboring country, as well as the protection of the population of Donbass from “genocide”; from Kyiv. Ukraine, in response, severed diplomatic relations with Moscow and declared martial law.

Against the backdrop of a special operation, the heads of state— members of the North Atlantic Alliance at the end of June adopted a new NATO strategic concept, in which Russia is called the most significant and direct threat to the security of the bloc. At the same time, the document notes that the alliance does not seek confrontation and does not pose a threat to Russia, and is also ready to keep channels of communication with Moscow open, despite the fact that it no longer considers it a partner.

This is not the first time the Russian leadership has accused NATO of an aggressive policy towards Moscow. In particular, the first deputy head of the presidential administration, Sergei Kiriyenko, said that the bloc was conducting a “hot military operation”; against Russia on the territory of Ukraine. Putin called the expansion of NATO to the East one of the reasons for holding the NWO in Ukraine.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Will investors be able to make money on people's desire to hide on the Web? or goods that are stuck in Europe Instructions Pro Russian maybe: how the risk management of the largest companies in Russia has changed Articles Pro “I left the boss humiliated”: how to deal with toxicity at work inaction: what happens to us in a dream quality of your life


The head of the Main Directorate of the General Staff accused the United States of “color revolutions” in the Middle East

Kostyukov: US is behind “color revolutions” in the Middle East and Africa The “destructive activity” of the US and its allies is most clearly seen in Iraq and Libya, Kostyukov said. They planned to implement the same scenario in Syria, but Russia turned the tide, he added. ” media=”(max-width: 320px) and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2), (max-width: 320px) and (min-resolution: 192dpi)” >

< img class="aligncenter" src="" alt="The head of the Main Directorate of the General Staff accused the United States of "color revolutions" in the Middle East "/>

The conflicts that have taken place over the past 20 years in the countries of the Middle East are similar in their scenarios, the United States and its allies are behind them, said Igor Kostyukov, head of the Main Directorate of the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces, during a speech at the X Moscow Conference on International Security. The broadcast was conducted on the page of the Ministry of Defense in VKontakte.

“The situation in the Middle East and North Africa remains tense, primarily as a result of the destructive activities of the United States and its allies, who are trying to maintain their dominance, achieve subordination of the leadership of the countries of the region, and also gain access to natural resources,” — said Kostyukov.

According to him, for this, Washington and its allies use “any means: political pressure, blackmail, provocations that shake the countries of the region” color revolutions “; and even open aggression”, while all this is done “under the slogans of democratization, the fight against authoritarian regimes, and also, as it is declared, to build the so-called order based on rules.”

As a result, once prosperous and sovereign countries are turning into states weakened by armed conflicts “with a significant drop in the performance of national economies,” Kostyukov continued. “Their territory becomes a haven for international and regional terrorist organizations, while Western companies get free access to natural resources,” — he declared.

Most clearly such scenarios, according to him, are visible in Iraq and Libya. The United States planned to implement the same scenario in Syria, the head of the Main Directorate of the General Staff noted, but Russia turned the tide.

The United States sent its troops to Syria in September 2014 under the auspices of the fight against the Islamic State terrorist group. (banned in Russia). With the support of Washington, which leads the international coalition in Syria, the Syrian Democratic Forces military alliance was created in the country, the core of which is Kurdish self-defense units.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Workers perceive changes with hostility. How to overcome their resistance Instructions Pro How the TV advertising market in Russia has changed after February and what will happen in the fall the country with the most paradoxical economic model lives Articles Pro The main thing is not to reach Abibas: what should be the import-substituting brand Articles Pro How governments around the world are taking windfall profits from oilmen Articles Pro What are circadian rhythms and how they will help you become more productive Articles

United States repeatedly reported the liquidation of members of terrorist organizations. On July 12, the central command of the troops announced the liquidation of the head of the local IS cell, Mahir al-Agala.

Authors Tags Subscribe to VK RBC Get news faster than anyone


Zakharova called the condition for breaking diplomatic relations with the United States

Zakharova: US can forget about relations with Russia if terror is declared by sponsor “image/webp” media=”(max-width: 320px) and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2), (max-width: 320px) and (min-resolution: 192dpi)” >< source srcset=" 1010w" type="image/webp" media="(max-width: 640px) and (-webkit-min-device-pixel-ratio: 2), (max-width: 640px) and (min-resolution: 192dpi)" >

Maria Zakharova

In the event that Russia is declared a country— As a sponsor of terrorism, Moscow will sever all diplomatic relations with the United States. About this on the air of the TV channel “Russia 1” said the official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Maria Zakharova.

Zakharova said that Moscow had given clear explanations about the consequences of Russia's possible inclusion in the list of countries— US sponsors of terrorism. «We talked about it— and not only orally, but also in writing, these comments were posted, and even translated into English. Therefore, here, of course, the question is to the level of those people with whom we are dealing. But everything has been repeatedly stated,»— she said.

In late July, the US Senate passed a resolution calling on Secretary of State Anthony Blinken to recognize Russia as a “country”; sponsor of terrorism. Later, Politico reported that Congressmen from the Democratic and Republican parties are going to submit a bill to the House of Representatives. They hope that Congress can give Moscow such a status, bypassing the State Department.

At the same time, Blinken said that the sanctions adopted against Russia already have the same consequences that led to the recognition of her country— sponsor of terrorism.

Now the list of sponsors of terrorism in the United States includes four countries— Iran, North Korea, Cuba and Syria.

Inclusion in the list means strict restrictions on interaction with this state, a ban on the export of defense goods, control over the export of dual-use products, financial and other restrictions— these measures are included in the list of anti-Russian sanctions. In addition, sanctions are envisaged against other states that maintain trade relations with a sponsor of terrorism.

The White House said that they are studying the possibility of including Russia among the countries— sponsors of terrorism. In early August, Democratic and Republican senators Richard Blumenthal and Lindsey Graham called for recognition of Russia as such, regardless of the presence or absence of support from President Joe Biden.

Read on RBC Pro Pro How Pakistan was on the verge of default and which countries will be next Pro Articles How to change brand design at different stages of development Pro Articles “You're just a cog”: what it's like to work at Microsoft – in 5 points Pro articles “I left the boss humiliated”: how to deal with toxicity at work Pro articles Will bank transactions be protected after the departure of the French Thales Articles Pro “An easy path to wealth”: the secrets of successful investment Summary

Director of the North American Department of the Russian Foreign Ministry Alexander Darchiev in an interview with TASS said that recognizing Russia as a sponsor of terrorism would be the point of no return. According to him, in this case, Moscow will lower the level of diplomatic relations with Washington or completely break off diplomatic relations.

So far, the only countries in which Russia has been recognized as a sponsor of terrorism are Lithuania and Latvia.

Tags Subscribe to RuTube RBC Live broadcasts, videos and recordings of programs on our RuTube channel


Reuters learned that the United States fears the recruitment of Afghan military by Russia and China

Former members of the Afghan security services who remained in the country after the Taliban came to power (described as terrorist and banned in Russia) may be vulnerable to recruitment by Russia, China and Iran. This is reported by Reuters with reference to the report of the Republicans from the Foreign Affairs Committee of the US House of Representatives.

The document notes that former Afghan law enforcement officers are well aware of US operations, so their recruitment may threaten Washington's interests. According to Republicans, some ex-Afghan soldiers have already fled to Iran.

The authors of the report believe that the administration of US President Joe Biden did not set the right priorities during the evacuation after the arrival of the Taliban and made a mistake by leaving the said military in Afghanistan.

The Taliban came to power in Afghanistan last August, after they managed to step up the offensive in connection with the departure of the American military contingent that had been in the country since 2011. The President of the Republic, Ashraf Ghani, fled to the UAE.

Western countries, including the United States, do not recognize the authority of the Taliban, but the movement believes that it has fulfilled all the conditions for recognition.

Zamir Kabulov, Russian presidential envoy for Afghanistan, said that in order to officially recognize the Taliban government, it is necessary to create an inclusive government and respect for human rights in Afghanistan. Nevertheless, already at the end of March, Russia accredited a Taliban diplomat in Moscow.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Remote employees began to work worse: how to ethically control them Instructions Pro The most important tax amendments that will appear in autumn 2022 Articles Pro How Pakistan is on the verge of default and which countries will be next Articles Pro “The easy way to wealth”: the secrets of successful investing Summary Pro Consumers are cutting costs. In what niches does it make sense to open a business Instructions Pro From 2009 to 2022: how offices in Moscow were tempered in crises Forecasts Pro Is it now possible for residents of the Russian Federation to transfer currency abroad Articles Pro Import substitution “under pressure”: what threatens the lack of competition in IT Forecasts Tags Subscribe to VK RBC Get news faster than anyone else


Antonov said that the United States is approaching a dangerous line of confrontation with Russia

Russian Ambassador Antonov: US continues to “pour fuel on the fire” of the Ukrainian conflict “image/webp” media=”(max-width: 320px) and (min-resolution: 192dpi)” >< source srcset=" 590w" type="image/webp" >

The United States is increasingly drawn into the Ukrainian conflict and is approaching the dangerous line of confrontation with Russia. This was stated by Russian Ambassador to Washington Anatoly Antonov, commenting on the decision of the States on the next “package” military assistance to Ukraine.

“Such a line will not give anything good for peace and security, but will only prolong the agony of the Ukrainian regime,” — he stressed.

According to him, the US decision to allocate $ 1 billion to Kyiv confirms that they do not intend to listen to the “voice of reason”; and are not going to contribute to a peaceful settlement of the crisis.

Antonov called cynical statements by the US authorities that the supply of military products to Ukraine will strengthen its position at the negotiating table with Russia.

“It is not clear how one can, in principle, talk about dialogue in conditions when the only goal of the United States— prolong the conflict as much as possible,— the ambassador pointed out.

He emphasized that the pumping of the country with weapons is increasingly causing concern in the United States itself, as evidence of fraudulent schemes is emerging in the transportation of military products. The weapons that end up on the front line in Ukraine are used by Ukrainian militants to strike residential areas in the cities of Donbass. Kyiv also exposes the whole of Europe to extreme danger by attacking the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Construction: how to protect yourself from unscrupulous contractor actions and nothing back: top 5 personal bankruptcies in Russia Cases Pro x The Economist Inflation 160%: why the Turkish authorities cannot contain the price increase #039;s Healthy Articles Pro Alibaba Founder Jack Ma: 'I Want to Die on the Beach, Not in the Office' Articles Pro How Companies Cut Payroll Spending: Four Scenarios Articles more likely to open the eyes of US citizens to who exactly their country supports, — emphasized Antonov.

As the diplomat noted, developing countries are watching US policy “with surprise and incomprehension”, wondering “is it really so easy to throw away billions of dollars into the void” that could be spent on the socio-economic needs of Latin America, Africa and Asia.< /p>

Earlier it became known that the United States will provide Ukraine with a new $1 billion military aid package. M113 vehicles, as well as artillery ammunition, a thousand FGM-148 Javelin man-portable anti-tank systems, medicines and explosives.

Total US military assistance to Ukraine after the implementation of this package will increase to $9.8 billion from February 2022 and to $11.8 billion since 2014.

Authors Tags How does this concern you?

Explained in the evening newsletter

$99 per month


Missiles for HIMARS and Javelin included in the new package of assistance to Ukraine from the United States

The next package of US military assistance to Ukraine has become the largest in recent times, its cost is estimated at $1 billion. These funds will be mainly spent on the purchase of ammunition for already delivered systems< source srcset=" 1200w" media="(min-resolution: 192dpi)" >

The U.S. is providing Ukraine with a new $1 billion military aid package, which will be the largest single delivery of military products, Reuters reports.

Ukraine is to receive HIMARS missiles for multiple launch rocket systems, ammunition for NASAMS anti-aircraft missile systems, 50 armored medical vehicles M113, as well as artillery ammunition, a thousand man-portable anti-tank systems FGM-148 Javelin, medical supplies and explosives.

The total amount of US military assistance to Ukraine after the implementation of this package will grow to $9.8 billion from February 2022 and to $11.8 billion from 2014.

The Pentagon spokesman also said that the final analysis of the possibility of delivering F-16 fighters to Ukraine is not yet ready. According to him, this option does not apply to the short term.

On July 21, the head of the US Air Force headquarters, General Charles Brown Jr., said that Ukraine could receive modern fourth-generation fighters from Western countries. “There are American, there are Gripen from Sweden, there is Eurofighter or Rafale. So there are a number of different weapons systems that could go to Ukraine, — the general said at the time.

The planes planned for transfer will not be Russian-made, Brown Jr. added. At the same time, he stressed that he could not yet specify which fighters Ukraine would receive.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Who controls the cryptocurrency and what does the DAO have to do with it? Articles Pro Why only 8% of Russians strive for unlimited wealth Research Pro Take 15 billion rubles and nothing back: top 5 personal bankruptcies in Russia Cases Pro Where it is safe and profitable for Russians to buy foreign real estate Articles Pro Companies change software at extreme speeds. What mistakes do they make?On August 1, Ukrainian Defense Minister Oleksiy Reznikov announced that the country's army had already received the German Mars II MLRS. Germany announced the transfer of three multiple rocket launchers to Ukraine in June.

Mars II— German version of the American MLRS M270 MLRS. It is capable of firing various munitions, including guided missiles with a GPS system. Batteries with a combat load of 12 missiles are mounted on tracked vehicles that can move at speeds up to 50 km/h.

Then Reznikov said that four more US-made HIMARS MLRS units arrived in Ukraine.

On August 2, Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said that the Russian military had destroyed 33 American-made M777 howitzers, five launchers since the beginning of the special operation in Ukraine the Harpoon anti-ship missile system, as well as six launchers and over 200 HIMARS MLRS missiles.

“We believe that the United States is purposefully and diligently adding fuel to the fire, the United States, obviously, really adheres to the line that fight with Russia to the last Ukrainian,»,— commented in June on the supply of American weapons by the press secretary of the President of Russia Dmitry Peskov. He noted that the supplies “do not contribute to awakening the desire of the Ukrainian leadership to resume peace negotiations.” According to him, Moscow has a negative attitude towards the US plans.

Authors Tags Subscribe to RuTube RBC Live broadcasts, videos and recordings of programs on our RuTube channel


The Pentagon said that the position of the United States on China and Taiwan has not changed

< source srcset=" 1200w" type="image/webp" media="(min-resolution: 192dpi) " >

The United States adheres to the policy of one China and does not recognize the independence of Taiwan. Colin Kahl, Deputy Secretary of Defense for Political Affairs of the United States, spoke about this at a briefing. The broadcast was on the Pentagon's Twitter (the social network was blocked in Russia at the request of the prosecutor's office).

“The United States adheres to the policy of one China, and our policy has not changed” it is support for the status quo,— Cal reported.

China wants to change the current state of affairs, according to a Pentagon representative, Kahl answered a journalist's question about Chinese army exercises in the Taiwan Strait.

China announced military exercises in response to the visit of US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who visited Taiwan's capital Taipei on August 2. The Chinese authorities sharply criticized Pelosi's visit, saying that she challenged the world, deliberately committed a provocation and violated the “one China” principle. Beijing has suspended US cooperation in a number of areas and decided to impose sanctions against Pelosi.

Washington insists that Pelosi's arrival does not contradict the “one China” principle; and does not mean a change in US policy towards China. Secretary of State Anthony Blinken warned that Beijing's suspension of US-China dialogue on some issues, including climate change, would have long-term consequences. He called the measures that China is taking as part of military exercises disproportionate to Pelosi's peaceful visit to Taiwan.

According to the Taiwan Ministry of Defense, 66 aircraft and 14 warships are taking part in the Chinese exercises. Another 22 Chinese Air Force aircraft, according to the military department, entered the Taiwan air defense zone during August 7.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Construction: how Defend Yourself Against Contractor Fraud Pro Instructions “I wake up while the world sleeps”: why the former head of Disney gets up at 4.15 am Pro articles “Playground for adults”: what it's like to work at Google – in 6 points Pro x The Economist articles Inflation 160% : why the Turkish authorities can not contain the rise in prices Articles Pro Most sellers have raised prices on marketplaces. What are their mistakes? broadcasts, videos and recordings of programs on our RuTube channel


United States through the World Bank will allocate $ 4.5 billion to Ukraine for social benefits

The United States through the World Bank will provide $4.5 billion in additional assistance. The funds will be used for social transfers, medical services and pensions

The United States, through the Agency for International Development (USAID), will provide the government of Ukraine with $4.5 billion in assistance to help reduce the acute budget deficit. This was reported on the agency's website.

“These funds, provided by the United States through the World Bank, will allow the government of Ukraine to support key areas, including social and financial assistance to Ukrainians,”— the message says.

It is specified that we are talking about paying salaries to civil servants, healthcare workers, teachers, as well as ensuring the supply of gas and electricity to hospitals, schools and other critical infrastructure.

< p> the Ukrainian authorities will receive some tranches. The first tranche of $3 billion will be received in August.

“As soon as these additional funds are fully utilized, the US government will provide the government of Ukraine with a direct $8.5 billion in budget support,— noted in USAID.

Authors Tags Subscribe to RuTube RBC Live broadcasts, videos and recordings of programs on our RuTube channel


In the United States announced a serious attitude to the issuance of visas to UN delegates

The United States takes its visa obligations seriously under its New York headquarters agreement with the United Nations. This was stated in the American Permanent Mission to the UN, TASS reports.

Journalists asked if visas would be issued to Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and other members of the Russian delegation to participate in the high-level week of the General Assembly. Since February 26, Sergei Lavrov has been under US sanctions. They prohibit him from entering the United States, except as specifically determined by the US authorities.

“As a host country, the United States has an obligation under the UN Headquarters Agreement to facilitate travel to the UN Headquarters area for representatives of states— UN members. We take our obligations under the UN Headquarters Agreement seriously,— said in the permanent mission.

At the same time, representatives of Washington noted that according to US law, visa issues are confidential.

The high-level week of the 77th session of the UN General Assembly will be held from 20 to 26 September. This year it will be held face-to-face, unlike the previous two years, when due to the COVID-19 pandemic, some performances were pre-recorded on video. On the eve it became known that, on behalf of the President, the Russian delegation will be headed by Lavrov. His speech is scheduled for September 24.

In total, the delegation will include ten people, including: Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Vershinin, Chairman of the International Committee of the Federation Council Grigory Karasin, Permanent Representative of Russia to the UN Vasily Nebenzya.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Digital Bedouins: what kind of business do Russians go to the Emirates Articles Pro How to win a tender for a large company: 9 tips for IT business Instructions Pro Most sellers have raised prices on marketplaces. What are their mistakes Pro articles How companies cut wages: four scenarios Companies were allowed to hide their accounting records. What's the catch? Articles Tags Subscribe to Telegram


Polyansky criticized the lack of words about the United States in the speech of the UN head on Hiroshima

Deputy Representative Polyansky: UN Secretary General Guterres should have mentioned the US in his speech on Hiroshima According to the diplomat, the Secretary General should have mentioned in his speech that the US was the only one in the world to use nuclear weapons. Discussions about the atomic bombing of Hiroshima resumed on the occasion of its anniversary on August 6 image/webp” media=”(max-width: 320px) and (min-resolution: 192dpi)” >< source srcset=" 800w" type="image/webp" media="(max-width: 400px) and (min-resolution: 192dpi)" >

UN Secretary-General António Guterres, in his speech at the memorial ceremony for the victims of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima, should have mentioned the United States as the country that struck the blow, Dmitry Polyansky, First Deputy Permanent Representative of Russia to the world organization, said on Twitter.

“Dear General Secretary, nor should the world forget that it was the United States that committed this crime and is the only country to have used the atomic bomb against a civilian population without any military necessity. It would be correct if you also mentioned this in your statements, — he wrote.

Discussions about the atomic bombing resumed on the occasion of its anniversary on August 6.

At the end of World War II, on August 6, 1945, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima. After hitting her and another Japanese city— Nagasaki— Japan announced its surrender, the signing of the act of surrender became the formal end of the war.

According to various estimates, 70 & ndash; 100 thousand people died from the explosions. Five years from radioactive contamination, cancer and other delayed effects, the total death toll could exceed 300 thousand people.

On August 6, Guterres spoke at the memorial ceremony for the victims of the atomic bombing in Hiroshima and called on world powers to abandon nuclear weapons

“It is absolutely unacceptable that nuclear-weapon states allow the possibility of nuclear war,” — he said.