Tag: US

U.S. teachers who have received the required training should be eligible to carry personal weapons in schools, former U.S. President Donald Trump said at the U.S. National Rifle Association convention.

“We can all agree that our schools should not be the weakest targets <…>. That is why, as a comprehensive school safety plan, the time has come to allow trained teachers to carry weapons discreetly,— he said.

In addition, the ex-president called for more funding for the police. “We need to expand the funding, recruitment and training of police officers across the country. This is not a question of money, but will. If the United States has $40 billion for Ukraine, then we should be able to do whatever is necessary to protect our children,” — he noted.

As additional measures to protect schools, Trump proposed equipping all educational institutions with metal detectors, reinforcing classroom doors, and introducing a rule according to which a police or armed guard will be on duty at every educational institution on a permanent basis.

p>

An extraordinary convention of the association takes place against the backdrop of a shooting at an elementary school in the Texas city of Uvalde. The first reports of events at the school were received on May 24 at 11:43 local time (19:43 Moscow time). During the shooting, 21 people were killed— 18 children and three adults, said Senator Rolland Gutierrez. The attacker turned out to be an 18-year-old man, said Gov. Greg Abbott, who died during police detention.

US President Joe Biden, speaking to Congress after the tragedy, said that it was necessary to confront the “gun lobby”, because over the past ten years there have been more than 900 mass shootings in the United States.

Read on RBC Pro Pro

Consulting services are in demand more than ever: what companies want Articles Pro Castness, startups, caution – what you need to know about business in India Articles Pro You have decided to replace SAP with domestic solutions. What to prepare for Instructions Pro Which ruble is beneficial for the state – strong or weak? Articles Pro Coronavirus vaccine sales will fall. How Pfizer Will Grow Pro Articles Coffee: Answering Common Questions About Your Favorite Drink Pro Instructions How Fast Payments Becomes an Alternative to Apple Pay in Russia shooting in Uvalda became the most massive in terms of the number of victims in almost ten years— from the Sandy Hook High School shooting in Connecticut. Then 20 children and six adults died.

Tags Subscribe to RuTube RBC Live broadcasts, videos and recordings of programs on our RuTube channel

Источник rbc.ru

The fact that the United States next week may begin supplying multiple launch rocket systems to Kyiv was reported by CNN. Washington said that they have not yet finalized the next package of military assistance to Ukraine ” alt=”The Pentagon has not confirmed reports that the United States is ready to supply MLRS to Ukraine” />

Pentagon, USA

The US authorities have not yet decided on the possibility of supplying Ukraine with multiple launch rocket systems (MLRS), another package of military assistance so far not finalized. This was stated at a briefing by Pentagon spokesman John Kirby.

«We know that the Ukrainian side is requesting both privately and openly multiple launch rocket systems. But I will not talk about decisions that have not yet been made, — he said.

Kirby explained that Washington is working closely with Kyiv in order to “provide the best capabilities (weapons and equipment. — RBC)”, “but in order to start supplying something , need presidential approval».

Answering the question of how quickly weapons can be delivered to Ukraine, Kirby said that the delivery to the region after all the approvals and the formation of the cargo can be transferred within 48 hours. The Pentagon spokesman clarified that this was not about the time of final delivery to the territory of Ukraine, but about “the region as a whole.”

Speaking of how quickly Ukraine needs new arms deliveries, Kirby said: “Time doesn't work for us.

Read on RBC Pro Pro You want to start production: what benefits you can count on Articles Pro Cleansing by the crisis: thousands of sellers will leave Russian marketplaces Pro Option: What Mistakes Can Occur During Its Registration Pro Articles The self-employment market will grow. Perhaps the state will come to it Articles Pro How the system of fast payments becomes an alternative to Apple Pay in Russia Articles Pro You decided to replace SAP with domestic solutions. What to Prepare for Instructions

Earlier on May 27, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced the possibility of delivering multiple launch rocket systems to Kyiv. “MLRS will help them [the Ukrainian military] defend themselves against extremely hard strikes from Russian artillery, that’s what the world should be striving for now,” — said the British prime minister in an interview with Bloomberg.

He also said that the Russian armed forces are making “slow but tangible progress” in Donbass, while the Ukrainian side needs military support.

Since the beginning of the Russian military special operation in Ukraine, Western countries and NATO have refrained from supplying Kyiv with heavy weapons, fearing to provoke a negative reaction from Moscow. Deliveries of such equipment began only in the second half of April, although the Ukrainian leadership asked for them from the very beginning of the special operation.

The issue of the supply of MLRS to Ukraine began to be discussed in the US administration. Pentagon officials met with the CEO of Lockheed Martin last week to discuss deliveries and ramping up production of multiple launch rocket systems, a White House source at CNN reported May 27. CNN claimed that Washington intended to deliver MLRS to Ukraine next week.

The American self-propelled MLRS M270, adopted by several NATO countries, is capable of firing up to 12 tactical missiles in less than 60 seconds, and its accuracy is maintained in all modes, since the retargeting after each shot is monitored by a computer. Depending on the ammunition used, the M270 can hit targets at a distance of up to 300 km, which, as the channel notes, “will significantly increase the firing range of the Ukrainian artillery forces.” The crew of such an installation is three people, on the march it develops a speed of up to 64 km/h.

Representatives of the Ukrainian leadership and President Volodymyr Zelensky have previously stated that their country needs M142 and M270 multiple launch rocket systems. However, the Biden administration withheld such supplies for several weeks amid fears expressed in the National Security Council that Ukraine could use weapons to shell Russian territory. Another reason why the United States was in no hurry to transfer the MLRS, & mdash; doubts whether Washington can afford to give away so many high-quality military weapons.

Politico wrote that in response to requests from Kyiv, in recent months the United States has supplied Ukraine with old Soviet missile systems stored in allied warehouses.

p>

Moscow has warned that the supply of weapons by Western countries to Ukraine, the charges of which are capable of reaching the territory of Russia, will lead to an escalation. Moscow considers “inflating” supply of arms to Ukraine. At the same time, the Kremlin stated that they would not prevent Russia from achieving the goals of the military operation. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov also warned that the Russian military would consider any shipments in Ukraine that Russia considers to be foreign weapons supplies as legitimate targets.

Authors Tags Subscribe to RuTube RBC

Источник rbc.ru

Washington may temporarily lift sanctions on Belarusian potash fertilizers if the country allows Ukrainian grain to be exported to Latvia, WSJ sources say. Earlier, the newspaper reported that the UN Secretary General offered Moscow a similar deal “WSJ learned about the US plans to lift sanctions from Minsk in exchange for the transit of grain” />

The US authorities are considering the possibility of lifting restrictive measures imposed against potash fertilizers produced in Belarus if the official Minsk agrees to the transit of Ukrainian grain through the territory Belarus, The Wall Street Journal reported, citing informed sources.

The interlocutors of the publication clarified that these sanctions could be lifted for six months, if the Belarusian authorities agree, grain crops will be delivered by rail to the port of the Lithuanian city of Klaipeda .

Earlier, WSJ diplomatic sources reported a similar proposal by UN Secretary General António Guterres. According to sources, he urged Moscow to ease export restrictions on fertilizers from Russia and Belarus in exchange for the passage of ships with grain from Ukraine.

Russian Permanent Representative to the UN Vasily Nebenzya then called the publication “a free interpretation.” The diplomat said that during his visit to Russia at the end of April, Guterres did discuss the lifting of sanctions against potash fertilizers, but without reference to the situation with grain. “This issue was indeed raised by Guterres, but not in terms of exchanging one for the other,” — claimed Nebenzya.

The American authorities believe that about 20 million tons of grain have accumulated in Ukraine, which are difficult to take out of the country. The UN World Food Program estimates the volume of grain at 25 million tons, indicating that this situation has developed due to the “blocked ports of the Black Sea”; and infrastructure problems. “We are studying ways to bring this grain back to the world market and thereby achieve lower prices,” — US President Joe Biden announced in mid-May.

Read on RBC Pro Pro How not to make a mistake when creating your own brand Articles Pro The Russian economy has entered a period of change. How this affects banks Articles Pro The ceiling is above 700 thousand rubles. per month: how much No-code developers get Articles Pro Two cases on how to retain employees using stay-interviews Cases Pro Illusion of control: what you need to know about the dangers of time management Instructions Pro It's all about the head: how to switch to Russian ERP and what to choose Instructions Pro Head of 1C-Bitrix Sergey Ryzhikov: “Excess of resources is a mistake” Articles Pro Plan for the next 5 years: what awaits the IT infrastructure of companies in the Russian Federation to export 25 million tons of grain through the port of Novorossiysk. He added that the accusations against Moscow regarding the emergence of a food crisis “are not just absurd, but blasphemous.” “If you don't want to lift your self-inflicted sanctions, then why are you blaming us for the food crisis?”, — emphasized the diplomat. For the whole of 2021, Russia exported a similar amount of grain— 30 million tons, said the head of the Ministry of Economic Development Maxim Reshetnikov.

Materials for the article Authors Tags Subscribe to RuTube RBC Live broadcasts, videos and recordings of programs on our RuTube channel

Источник rbc.ru

Deputies of the Moscow Duma proposed to name the place near the American Embassy in Moscow as the Defenders of Donbass Square and change the address of the US diplomatic mission

Deputies of the Moscow City Duma from “United Russia”, “Fair Russia”, the Communist Party of the Russian Federation and the deputy association “My Moscow” proposed to name the area near the US Embassy in the capital “the square of the Defenders of Donbass”. We are talking about an unnamed place at the intersection of Bolshoi Devyatinsky Lane and Konyushkovskaya Street.

According to the head of the faction of the party “United Russia” in the Moscow City Duma, Stepan Orlov, chairman of the Moscow State Duma commission on urban economy and housing policy, the parliamentarians also propose changing the address of the US diplomatic mission from 8, Bolshoy Devyatinsky Lane, to the Defenders of Donbass Square. According to the authors of the initiative, if the proposal is approved, “American diplomats will receive a much more easily remembered topographic landmark.”

According to Orlov, residents of Moscow and city public associations “repeatedly turned to the deputies of the Moscow City Duma with requests to perpetuate on the map of the capital in memory of the heroism and military prowess of the defenders of Donbass».

The head of the Communist Party faction in the Moscow City Duma, Nikolai Zubrilin, said that the authors of the initiative “went on a constructive path”: they proposed not to change the Soviet names, but “to give the new square a worthy name.”

The proposal was handed over to the Moscow mayor's office.

p>

The issues of naming and renaming the territorial units of Moscow are handled by the City Interdepartmental Commission for the naming of territorial units, streets, metro stations, organizations and other objects; its activities are coordinated by the capital's department of cultural heritage.

Read on RBC Pro Pro How to understand that you are not overpaying your employees Pro Articles Sales of luxury goods are growing faster than expected. How to make money on it Articles Pro How in Russia they will sell goods with an “unfriendly” patent Articles Pro Not everything can be replaced: without these IT services it will be especially difficult for a business Instructions Pro Why freelancers still will not replace companies of key employees Instructions Pro Something new: how to transfer an employee to another company during downtime Articles Pro The Russian economy has entered a period of change. How it affects banks Articles Pro Gas supplies to the EU are falling. What will happen to Gazprom's shares Forecasts

In February 2018, a section of Wisconsin Avenue in front of the Russian Embassy in Washington was named after Boris Nemtsov. The politician was killed in 2015 in the center of Moscow with four shots in the back. In 2020, on the fifth anniversary of the assassination, the name of Boris Nemtsov was given to the square Pod Chestnuts, where the Russian embassy is located in Prague.

Materials for the article Authors Tags Subscribe to RuTube RBC channel

Источник rbc.ru

The US oil embargo on Venezuela has been in place since 2019. Negotiations to lift part of the restrictions have been ongoing since March. According to Vice President Delcy Rodriguez, this step was the beginning of the complete abolition of “illegal sanctions”

The United States abandoned restrictive measures that prevented the work of American and European oil companies in Venezuela. This was announced on Twitter by the vice-president of the Latin American country, Delcy Rodriguez.

“The Venezuelan government has verified and can confirm that the US has allowed its and European companies to negotiate and resume operations in Venezuela,” she wrote.

Rodriguez also noted that “Venezuela hopes that after this decision, the United States will start moving towards the complete removal of illegal sanctions.”

Earlier in the day, the US Treasury, in consultation with the State Department, issued a narrow license allowing US oil and gas company Chevron to negotiate a possible resumption of production in Venezuela that was halted by US sanctions.

United The states severed diplomatic relations with Caracas, imposed sanctions, and closed their embassy in 2019, accusing President Nicolás Maduro of electoral fraud. Negotiations between the United States and Venezuela on lifting the oil embargo resumed after Russia launched a special operation in Ukraine and imposed oil supply sanctions against Moscow.

Read on RBC Pro Pro PR of a state customer: where the difficulties lie Pro instructions An employee moved abroad: 4 options for how to apply for a job Instructions Pro Castness, startups, caution – what you need to know about business in India Articles Pro The risk of an eternal bear market is real. In which stocks to sit out the fall Forecasts Pro What can investors expect from the IPO of the creator of the TV show “Mask” and “Fort Boyard” Chinese stock market: what are the prospects for a private investor Club of investors

In early March, Reuters, citing sources, reported that US officials could not agree with the leadership of Venezuela on the easing of sanctions on oil exports. Proposals to ease sanctions included allowing Caracas to sell oil through Western companies. Venezuela demanded, among other things, the return of control over the state oil company PDVSA.

A few days later, US President Joe Biden announced the release of two Americans who were in custody in Venezuela. This happened after the visit of an American government delegation to Caracas.

Against the backdrop of the military operation in Ukraine and the ensuing anti-Russian sanctions, gasoline prices in the United States reached record levels. Biden has repeatedly accused Russia and President Vladimir Putin personally of rising prices and inflation, which also began to rise since the beginning of the conflict.

The Russian Embassy in the United States has previously stated that Washington is trying to earn political points through Russophobia to justify its own failures in solving domestic problems. The real cause of the fuel crisis, according to the embassy, ​​is record inflation for the United States— “unsecured trillion-dollar financial investments in the economy, as well as sanctions wars against objectionable states.”

Materials for the article Authors Tags Subscribe to RuTube RBC Live broadcasts, videos and recordings of programs on our RuTube channel

Источник rbc.ru

The White House is at risk of stepping on the rake of “Black Hawk Down”

US President Joe Biden is taking steps to bring US troops into Somalia. Troops will be deployed from other parts of Africa to train and provide other support to local forces in their fight against Islamist militants.

Photo: Global Look Press

Joe Biden signed an order on Monday to redeploy hundreds of US troops to Somalia to counter the Islamist extremist group Al-Shabaab. (recognized as terrorist and banned in several countries).

US troops will be brought in from other parts of Africa to train and provide other support to Somali forces in their fight against what is considered the largest and richest affiliate of the al-Qaeda extremist network. (a terrorist organization banned in the Russian Federation). As POLITICO notes, this serves as a reminder that the United States continues to wage a long struggle against Islamic extremists around the world, even as these efforts are overshadowed by the conflict in Ukraine and other events.

The decision to re-deploy US forces to Somalia is intended to “maximize the safety and effectiveness of our forces and enable them to provide more effective support to our partners,” National Security Council spokeswoman Adrienne Watson said in announcing the redeployment.

According to a senior Biden administration official, US forces in Somalia will number “less than 500” and are not sent for direct participation in hostilities. Instead, US military personnel will work with Somali forces and ensure the safety of State Department and US Agency for International Development personnel in the African country.

At the end of his presidential term in January 2021, Donald Trump abruptly ordered the withdrawal of about 700 US military personnel from Somalia, which was an extension of his broader policy of pulling the US out of what the 45th President called “endless wars” around the world.

Meanwhile, the head of the US Africa Command, General Stephen Townsend, told Congress in March that the rotations, which he called “traveling to work,” are inefficient and ineffective and put US troops at greater risk.

The Biden administration believes that Al-Shabaab remains a “conspicuous priority given the threat it poses” and that “permanent” the presence of the United States in Somalia will be necessary to counter the extremist group.

Pentagon chief Lloyd Austin has requested a deployment “to re-establish a permanent US military presence in Somalia to better deal with the al-Shabab group, which has grown in numbers and poses a heightened threat,” — said an administration official.

Biden's decision to sign the order was first reported by The New York Times, which also reported that the president had approved a Pentagon request for permanent authority to prosecute about a dozen suspected al-Shabaab leaders. The group is accused of killing more than a dozen Americans in East Africa, including three in a January 2020 attack on a base used by US counterterrorism forces in Kenya. Later that year, the US accused a Kenyan who took flying lessons in the Philippines of planning a 9/11-style hijacking on behalf of the Al-Shabaab group.

In recent months, the group has made territorial gains against the federal government of Somalia, wiping out the gains of the African Union peacekeepers who once pushed the militants into the country's remote areas.

The news of the decision to deploy the US military came after how on Sunday Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, Somalia's president from 2012 to 2017, was declared the winner of the presidential election.

Decades of military-political turbulence in Somalia began to fall apart in 1991, when the field the commanders overthrew the dictator Siad Barre, and then fought against each other. American soldiers were sent there in 1992 as part of a peacekeeping mission that continued until their withdrawal in 1994 — about five months after the humiliating fiasco known as Black Hawk Down in late 1993, when Somali militants shot down two American helicopters. As a result of the crash of aircraft and the subsequent rescue operation, 18 military personnel were killed.

Источник www.mk.ru

Seven Americans who fought on the side of Ukraine as part of the special forces were killed in the Donbass, the Chechen authorities said. The State Department previously said that one of them is alive and safe

Rubezhnoye

Seven American citizens who fought on the side of the Armed Forces of Ukraine as part of special forces were killed in the Ukrainian city of Rubezhnoye, RIA Novosti said. assistant to the head of Chechnya on the security bloc Apta Alaudinov.

He clarified that US citizens died as a result of the battle at the Dye Plant, one of them was named Joseph Ward Clark. “They were fixed by us, and they all departed to another world, leaving behind Javelins, documents and their weapons,” — Alaudinov reported.

A month earlier, on April 14, Clark's documents were published by the Minister of Information and Press of Chechnya, Akhmed Dudayev. He posted on VKontakte video showing the passport of a US citizen named Joseph Ward Clark.

Dudayev claimed that the passport belonged to one of the “representatives” of the US intelligence agencies that “work on the territory of Donbass and are engaged in the destruction of the civilian population.” “They all find shelter here in the Ukrainian land, the so-called,” added the Chechen minister.

On the same day, the State Department called reports of Clark's death or capture untrue. “I'm limited in what I can say due to privacy concerns, but I have reason to believe this person is safe,” — said department spokesman Ned Price.

Read on RBC Pro Pro The risks of layoffs: how not to fall into the trap Pro instructions How to develop the ability to solve problems creatively in a company Pro articles How to deal with anxiety before the first interview Pro instructions How the relevance of digital assets and currencies is changing Pro articles When the employer's generosity to The Federal Tax Service will be interested in paying bonuses – cases Cases Pro A top manager received an offer in a crisis: when to agree Articles Pro x The Economist Why economists and ordinary people estimate inflation differently Articles Pro >At the end of April, 22-year-old American citizen Willie Joseph Kansel died in Ukraine, CNN was told by the family of the deceased. According to the channel, he participated in the hostilities among the fighters of a private military company (PMC). The US State Department noted that they are aware of what happened and are monitoring the situation.

The US administration then recommended that US citizens refrain from traveling to Ukraine and not participate in hostilities. “We know that people want to help, but we urge Americans to find other ways to do it, — urged the representative of the White House Jen Psaki.

Materials for the article Authors Tags Subscribe to RuTube RBC Live broadcasts, videos and recordings of programs on our RuTube channel

Источник rbc.ru

According to the Russian ambassador to the United States, Washington “really dislikes” Russia's Sarmat intercontinental missiles and Poseidon unmanned underwater vehicles, so they insist on limiting their use

Russian Ambassador to the United States Anatoly Antonov

Washington “doesn't like” Russia's strategic weapons, including the intercontinental ballistic missile “Sarmat” and the carrier of unmanned underwater vehicles “Poseidon”, they insist on the restriction or complete ban on their use. About this on the air «Soloviev Live» said Russian Ambassador to the United States Anatoly Antonov.

«Poseidon» they really don't like, they really don't like Sarmat, and in all the meetings that we have with academia, we are told all the time that in a future arms control agreement, these Poseidons should be banned, of course, it is necessary to limit the use of “Sarmatians” and so on»,— said the diplomat.

«Sarmat»— complex with a heavy intercontinental missile, its weight exceeds 200 tons. Firing range— 18 thousand km. The missile has a short active flight segment, which complicates the process of intercepting it by means of air defense.

According to the director general and designer of the State Missile Center. Makeev (the developer of Sarmat) Vladimir Degtyar, the rocket is capable of providing a flight path around the entire globe.

On April 20, the Ministry of Defense announced the first successful launch of the Sarmat. The launch was carried out from the Plesetsk cosmodrome, the warheads of the rocket reached the test site in Kamchatka, and the design characteristics of the rocket were confirmed at all stages of the flight, the ministry said. Head of Roskosmos Dmitry Rogozin then stated that the first Sarmat missiles will be put into service in the Krasnoyarsk Territory no later than the autumn of 2022.

On the development of the missile “Sarmat” first told by Russian President Vladimir Putin in 2018. He called the rocket “unique” a weapon that can ensure the security of Russia from external threats, and also stated that there are no analogues “in the world and will not be for a long time to come.” He repeated these words, congratulating the military on the launch in April this year.

Read on RBC Pro Pro How to get a preferential mortgage: a checklist for employees of IT companies Instructions Pro “Already abroad, but I can recommend a friend”: how to contain the outflow in IT Instructions Pro So-so motivation: why you should not tie salaries to KPI Research Pro Why the idea of ​​import substitution is still more like a utopia Articles Pro “Domestic Entrepreneurs”: how to reveal the potential of an innovator Articles Pro Gas supplies to the EU are falling. What will happen to Gazprom's shares Forecasts Pro Advertising as a remedy for depression: how Kellogg's survived the recession of the 1930s

Источник rbc.ru

According to the President of the United States, reducing the budget deficit is one of the main ways to ease inflationary pressures .jpg” alt=”Biden announced his intention to cut the US budget deficit by $1.5 trillion” />

The US authorities intend to cut the US budget deficit by a record $1.5 trillion this year. This was stated on his Twitter by American President Joe Biden.

“Under my predecessor, the deficit increased every year. This year we [the administration] are on track to reduce the deficit by $1.5 trillion— biggest one-year cut in history,— he wrote.

Biden stressed that deficit reduction— one of the main ways to ease inflationary pressure.

By the end of 2020, the US budget deficit increased by $3.12 trillion, and by the end of 2021— for $2.77 trillion. In early February 2022, the total US national debt for the first time exceeded $30 trillion, the amount became equal to $30.012 trillion.

Last December, Biden signed into law an increase in the national debt limit by $2.5 trillion to $31.4 trillion. If not for this measure, the funds in the federal budget could run out by December 15, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen warned.

On May 4, the US Federal Reserve System (FRS) announced the largest interest rate hike since 2000— immediately by 0.5 percentage points, up to a range of 0.75 & ndash; 1% per annum. At the same time, the American regulator pointed to the appropriateness of further tightening of its policy. Thus, in March, the growth rate of prices in the US broke a 40-year record, rising to 8.5%. Nevertheless, inflation slowed down in April and, according to the US Department of Labor, amounted to 8.3%. For 2022, the Fed predicts inflation of 4.3% with US GDP growth of 2.8%.

US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said on May 10 that the US labor market may be experiencing the biggest supply-demand imbalance since World War II. Unemployment in the US rose to 6.1% in April from 6% in March, according to the country's Department of Labor. At the same time, in the first quarter of 2022, the US economy shrank by 1.4% year-on-year, according to preliminary data from the US Department of Commerce.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Work 12 hours, 6 days a week. How it's to open a business in China How-tos Pro How to pick up IKEA customers: how advertising campaigns worked after February 24 Case studies Pro Philip Kotler's principles of digital marketing: how to work with a client » IT infrastructure for Russian affiliates Instructions Pro Why did CNN+ close and what will happen to other streaming services? Subscribe to Telegram RBC Stay up to date with the latest news even in conditions of blocking

Источник rbc.ru

WP: The US has banned the transfer of data on Russian military leadership and targets outside Ukraine to Kiev Washington will not be able to transfer information to Kyiv about Russian targets outside Ukraine and the top leadership of the Russian Armed Forces, for example, about Shoigu or Gerasimov. The ban does not apply to data on Russian officers on the territory of Ukraine

The administration of US President Joe Biden has developed guidelines for intelligence sharing with Ukraine in order to avoid escalating tensions between Washington and Moscow, The Washington Post reports, citing sources.

The document, according to the newspaper, prohibits the United States from transmitting Ukraine information that “helped to take life” high-ranking Russian officers. This also applies to Chief of the General Staff Valery Gerasimov and Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu.

At the same time, the newspaper writes, the ban does not apply to data on Russian officers, including generals, who are on the territory of Ukraine. However, a senior Pentagon official told WP that Washington has tacitly decided not to give Kyiv information about the whereabouts of the Russian generals.

The second category of information that Washington will not be able to share with Kyiv,— this is any data that would help the Ukrainian side to attack Russian targets outside of Ukraine, the newspaper writes. According to WP sources, the ban is in part to prevent “the United States from becoming a participant in attacks that Ukraine could carry out on Russian territory.”

The United States regularly exchanges intelligence with Ukraine about Russian ships in the Black Sea, which could be used to support offensives against cities like Odessa, according to an unnamed Pentagon official. He stressed that it— “not specific information,” the purpose of the data transfer is not for Ukraine to strike at them, but for Kyiv to be able to prepare for defense. For example, the authorities may take measures to strengthen the defense of the city or evacuate civilians, the source said.

According to US and Ukrainian officials, in addition, the United States transmits real-time information to Ukraine about the location and movement of Russian troops on territory of the country. This includes satellite imagery and intelligence.

Read on RBC Pro Pro How to abandon the Western HR system Instructions Pro Hidden resources and unjustified expenses: how to improve the financial situation Lecture Pro More than 25% of newcomers leave the company almost immediately. How to keep them How to keep them Pro instructions How to properly arrange a remote employee Pro instructions Ten ways to help the manager avoid burnout Pro instructions Why and how to refuse overtime Pro x The Economist articles Why economists and ordinary people assess inflation differently Pro articles As a participant

The New York Times also reported that the United States gave Ukraine intelligence data that the Ukrainian military used to strike Russian positions, stating, that they do not include information about the advances of high-ranking officials of the Russian military leadership. The Pentagon indicated that Kyiv is provided with the information “which they can use for self-defense.”

On May 6, CNN, citing sources, reported that the United States had provided intelligence to Ukraine about the location of the Moskva cruiser. in the Black Sea shortly before the fire started on the ship. According to the Russian Ministry of Defense, on April 14, due to a fire on board, ammunition detonated, the cruiser sank. As a result, the ministry said one person was killed, 27 were missing and 396 more were evacuated. The Pentagon denied passing this information to Kyiv.

NBC reported May 7 that Biden, in a meeting with CIA Director William Burns and Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, demanded an end to leaks of information about the exchange of data between US and Ukrainian intelligence, as it “distracts from our common goal».

According to the press secretary of the Russian President Dmitry Peskov, the transfer of intelligence by the West to Ukraine will not prevent Russia from achieving the goals of the military operation.

Article content Authors Tags Subscribe to RuTube RBC Live broadcasts , videos and recordings of programs on our RuTube channel

Источник rbc.ru

The allocation of this amount to help Ukraine was approved by the House of Representatives of Congress. Medvedev said that the purpose of providing Kyiv with such “huge” funds is to continue the proxy war against Russia in order to limit its development

Dmitry Medvedev

Money, the allocation of which to Kyiv was approved by the US House of Representatives, — huge, and “there will be a lot of hunters to divide them in the American military-industrial complex,” Dmitry Medvedev, deputy chairman of the Russian Security Council, is sure.

“It is clear that ‘help’ on such an unprecedented scale is not at all due to love for Ukraine and not even support for its own economy. Her goal— the continuation of the proxy war against Russia, the desire to inflict a heavy defeat on our country, limit its economic development and political influence in the world,— Medvedev wrote in his Telegram. In his opinion, Washington will not be able to carry out its plan: “their printing press will break faster”, due to which the US national debt is constantly increasing, and the goals of the Russian military operation in Ukraine will be achieved.

The politician noted that the Americans can thank “their Russophobic authorities” for rising prices for gasoline and groceries.

Earlier, the House of Representatives passed a bill on additional assistance to Ukraine for $40 billion. The aid package includes the supply of weapons and humanitarian aid to Kyiv. Now the initiative must be approved by the upper house of the US Congress— Senate.

President Joe Biden asked for $33 billion in bailouts, but congressmen, as Medvedev put it, “donated a couple more billion out of generosity.”

Since the beginning of the Russian military operation in Ukraine, Washington has transferred more than $3.5 billion worth of weapons (howitzers, Stinger anti-aircraft systems, Javelin anti-tank missiles, Ghost drones) to Kyiv. The government’s funding package for the current fiscal year, adopted by the Senate, includes humanitarian, military and economic assistance Ukraine in the amount of about $13.6 billion.

Read on RBC Pro Pro The Phantom of the Checkered Bag: Why Parallel Imports Won't Return Shuttle Traders Why Freelancers Still Won't Replace Key Employees Instructions Pro Currency Crime: How to Protect Your Business and Avoid Falling Victim of the Law Webinar Pro Why and How to Refuse Overtime Articles Pro More than 25% of newcomers leave the company almost immediately. How to keep them Instructions

On May 9, Biden signed a law on lend-lease for Ukraine (under a similar program, the United States during the Second World War leased or transferred military equipment and equipment to its allies on a long-term loan).

The Russian side has warned Western countries more than once that convoys with foreign weapons on the territory of Ukraine will become legitimate military targets. At the same time, the authorities emphasize that the supply of weapons to Kyiv will not prevent Moscow from conducting a special military operation.

Article content Authors Tags Subscribe to VK RBC Get news faster than anyone else

Источник rbc.ru

The Bulgarian government has not specified how the cost of gas will be calculated when buying from the United States and how much it will be. At the end of April, Gazprom stopped deliveries to Bulgaria due to non-payment in rubles .jpg” alt=”Bulgaria agreed to buy LNG from the US at prices lower than from Gazprom” />

Bulgaria will buy LNG from the US at prices lower than those of Gazprom, the Bulgarian government said in a statement. Deliveries will begin in June.

The corresponding agreement was reached during a meeting between Bulgarian Prime Minister Kirill Petkov and US Vice President Kamala Harris.

“The Bulgarian Prime Minister pointed out that what is happening in Europe is a clear sign of the need for accelerated and real measures in the energy sector. Vice President Kamala Harris congratulated Bulgaria on taking decisive action to defend its energy sovereignty,— said in a government release.

The Bulgarian government has not indicated how the price of gas supplied from the United States will be calculated, and how much it will be.

Until March 2020, the cost of Russian gas for Bulgaria was determined by a contract with a link to the price of oil. However, from the beginning of 2020, Sofia began to seek a discount, as prices on the spot European gas markets turned out to be lower and countries whose contracts were not linked to the price of oil found themselves in more favorable conditions.

In March 2020, ” ;Gazprom» reduced the price of gas for Bulgaria by 40%.

Read on RBC Pro Pro Not all international business is gone. How to build communications for the rest Instructions Pro x The Economist Why economists and ordinary people estimate inflation differently remote employee Instructions Pro It's all about the head: how to switch to Russian ERP and what to choose Instructions Pro Business is in line for cloud services. What services are in demand? with reference to the European gas market.

At the end of April of this year, Bulgaria reported that Gazprom Export notified its Bulgarian partner, the Bulgargaz company, of the suspension of gas supplies. The Russian company later confirmed the message, specifying that such a decision was made due to non-payment in rubles.

Bulgarian Energy Minister Alexander Nikolov later explained that the procedure for paying for gas in rubles, on which Russia insists “involves significant risks.” “In practice, we will lose control of our money after paying in US dollars, as we agreed. There will be a risk of breach of obligations— non-fulfilment [of conditions] by a Russian bank, which will be responsible for converting the corresponding amount into rubles, — he clarified.

Bulgaria warned the Russian side about the refusal to pay for Russian gas in rubles even earlier.

French Minister of Environmental Transformations Barbara Pompili called the cessation of gas supplies to Bulgaria a violation of contracts.

Materials for the article Authors Tags Subscribe to VK RBC Get news faster than anyone else

Источник rbc.ru

Photo: ruwikipedia

According to CNN, on May 10, the US authorities began deliveries to Ukraine of another batch of Mi-17 helicopters. In total, 11 such aircraft will be sent.

The Pentagon clarified that the Ukrainian military had already received a batch of Mi-17 helicopters from the United States earlier.

The plans to deliver these helicopters to Kyiv were announced in January by an official representative White House Jen Psaki. It was then about helicopters in the Pentagon's stocks.

Источник www.mk.ru

US to supply Ukraine with 25,000 artillery shells and $150 million worth of radars The cost of this military assistance package will be up to $150 million. will supply Ukraine with 25,000 artillery shells and radars” />

The new military aid package for Ukraine will include 25,000 155mm artillery shells, AN/TPQ-36 anti-artillery radars and jamming equipment, total the package will cost up to $150 million, according to the Pentagon.

The United States will also supply field equipment and spare parts.

“The capabilities of this package are tailored to meet Ukraine's critical needs in today's struggle as Russian forces continue their offensive in eastern Ukraine,” the message says.

The agency notes that this is the ninth delivery of military aid to Ukraine since August 2021. During the time that President Joe Biden has been in charge of the United States, Washington has allocated about $4.5 billion to Kyiv in security assistance, with $3.8 of them— since the beginning of the Russian military operation on February 24. Since 2014, the United States has provided more than $6.5 billion in aid to Ukraine, the Pentagon said.

The military department added that the United States continues to work with its allies and partners to identify and provide Ukraine with additional capabilities for self-defense.

New deliveries of military aid to Ukraine were previously announced by Biden. At the same time, he said that the presidential administration, after this announcement, had practically exhausted the funds that could be used to send military assistance to Ukraine without the approval of Congress. Biden called on lawmakers to quickly approve the additional funding needed.

Read on RBC Pro Pro How to protect management in a crisis Pro instructions How the relevance of digital assets and currencies is changing Pro articles Ten ways to help a manager avoid burnout Pro instructions From September 11 to the pandemic: how Booking Holdings overcame crises Pro articles words the employer can be fined Instructions Pro x The Economist Not only SAP: will we see new IT giants in Europe Articles Pro More than 25% of newcomers leave the company almost immediately. How to Keep Them How To Pro x The Economist Why Economists and the Common People Think Differently About Inflation Articles

Prior to this, White House press secretary Jen Psaki announced the president's intention on May 9 to sign a law on the lend-lease program for Ukraine (a program under which the United States leased or transferred military equipment to allies on a long-term loan during World War II).

At the end of April, Biden urged Congress to increase aid to Ukraine by more than 10 times — from $3 billion to $33 billion. Of this amount, $20 billion should go to armaments, military equipment and equipment for soldiers, $8.5 billion — for direct economic support, $3 billion — for humanitarian aid and food security. On April 29, Psaki said that the authorities had $250 million left to provide military assistance to Kyiv.

The United States, the European Union and some other countries began to supply Ukraine with weapons even before the start of the Russian military operation and increased their support after the outbreak of hostilities. On April 21, the Pentagon promised to transfer to Ukraine 72 howitzers and 144 thousand artillery shells for them, 72 towing vehicles and 121 Phoenix Ghost tactical drones. On the same day, Biden announced his intention to provide Kyiv with $800 million in security assistance and $500 million in direct economic support. On April 30, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov called on the United States and NATO to stop supplying Ukraine with weapons and ammunition and accused the alliance of trying to prevent the completion of the military operation by reaching political agreements between Moscow and Kyiv.

Article content Authors Tags Subscribe to Telegram

Источник rbc.ru

The American authorities recognize the connection between the rise in fuel prices in the United States and the sanctions imposed against Russian energy carriers, the Russian embassy said. The diplomatic mission urged the United States to redirect forces to solve their own problems The Russian Embassy called on the United States to redirect “irrepressible energy” />

International sanctions against Russia are counterproductive, with US officials acknowledging that restrictive energy measures will lead to instability in the energy market and higher fuel prices, the Russian embassy said.

“We recommend that America's ruling circles send their irrepressible energy to solve their own problems in the United States, — said in the message.

Sanctions will be ineffective, they are confident in the diplomatic mission, they said that the strengthening of the Russian currency speaks of the stability of the economy and the financial sector of the country. “This is recognized by the experts themselves from Western countries,” — say the embassy.

The ruble began to strengthen against the dollar and the euro in mid-March against the backdrop of statements by the Russian leadership about Russia's intentions to continue delivering oil and gas abroad in the national currency. After President Vladimir Putin signed the corresponding decree at the end of March, the dollar exchange rate reached 83 rubles, the euro— RUB 87.7

Then the Russian currency continued to strengthen: at the end of April, the dollar exchange rate for the first time since November last year fell below 71 rubles, and on May 4, for the first time since March 2020, it fell to 66.6 rubles. The euro exchange rate during the auction fell below 70 rubles— up to 69.8 rubles— for the first time since February 2020.

Read on RBC Pro Pro How new technologies “stole” the charisma of Starbucks Articles Pro Amazon: crazy ideas that paid off. Investor's digest Articles Pro How much the Russian economy will fall: forecasts and estimates of economists Articles Pro How to outwit trolls and malicious competitors. We repel an attack on the social network Instructions Pro There is no way out: how to legally carry out a reduction Instructions Pro Who and how will be punished for the implementation of Western sanctions Articles Pro I listen, but I don’t hear: why it is difficult for managers to give feedback Instructions Pro 4 important lessons of the crisis years for a manager: it’s time for them learn Articles

At the White House, during a briefing in early April, the strengthening of the ruble was explained by “artificial pumping”; The Central Bank and the government of Russia, expressing confidence that the exchange rate of the Russian currency cannot be considered a real indicator of the state of affairs in the economy. White House Communications Director Kate Bedingfield then expressed confidence that the sanctions against Russia are working.

The Kremlin did not agree with this assessment at the time. “You can focus [on the ruble exchange rate],” — said Dmitry Peskov, a spokesman for the Russian president.

In early March, the United States imposed a ban on oil and gas supplies from Russia, President Joe Biden announced this. He pointed out that this decision was supported by representatives of both parties of the Congress— Republican and Democratic. Then the cost of Brent oil exceeded $130, and the price of gasoline in the United States broke a historical record, the cost of a gallon (3.785 liters) reached $4.17. The last record was set in July 2008, when the price per gallon of gasoline was $4.11. At the end of March, the American president called the increase in gasoline prices “Putin's rise in price”.

Article content Authors Tags Subscribe to VK RBC Get news faster than anyone

Источник rbc.ru

All transactions involving Gazprom Germania or any legal entity in which the company owns a stake of 50% or more can be carried out until September 30, follows from the license of the Ministry of Finance. Previously, Gazprom ceased participation in the German subsidiary

The US Department of the Treasury has allowed transactions involving Gazprom Germania GmbH until September 30, 2022, according to the general license published on the agency's website.

The same applies to any legal entities in which Gazprom Germania owns a 50% or more share.

«All transactions related to Gazprom Germania GmbH or any legal entity in which Gazprom Germania GmbH owns directly or indirectly 50% or more <…> are permitted until 00:01 ET time September 30, 2022»,— it says.

On February 24, the day the Russian military operation in Ukraine began, the United States imposed sectoral sanctions that included Gazprom. Restrictions apply to the acquisition of debt and raising capital.

In early April, Gazprom terminated its participation in Gazprom Germania and withdrew its representatives from the governing bodies. The company also demanded from the former “daughter” abandon Gazprom's trademarks, including in names and symbols, “to avoid further identification of their activities with a Russian company.

German Economy Minister Robert Habeck said that

Gazprom Germania will come under the control of the Federal Network Agency by 30 September. Earlier Bloomberg reported that Berlin is looking for a buyer for the former “daughter” “Gazprom”. At the same time, the authorities do not exclude the nationalization of Gazprom Germania, but this will be extreme measures, Bloomberg reported.

Read on RBC Pro Pro How to survive the crisis: advice from Igor Rybakov, Fedor Ovchinnikov and others Will this lead to a global recession? were able to protect themselves from the high volatility of the ruble Articles

Gazprom Germania unites a number of companies operating in Europe, including Gazprom Marketing & Trading Ltd, Wingas, Gascade Gastransport, Astora, Gazprom NGV Europe (operator of gas filling stations in Germany and the Czech Republic) and others.

Article content Authors Tags Subscribe to Telegram

Источник rbc.ru

The author of the resolution proposed to allow the use of US military forces in Ukraine if Russia uses chemical, biological or nuclear weapons. Earlier, Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov said that the risks of nuclear war are very significant alt=”Resolution submitted to Congress to bring US military to Ukraine” />

US Congressman Adam Kinzinger

US Congressman Adam Kinzinger (R-Illinois) introduced a draft resolution that allows the use of American Armed Forces in Ukraine, if Russia uses chemical, biological or nuclear weapons, follows from the statement on the congressman's website.

“I am introducing this AUMF (Authorization for Use of Military Force) as a clear red line so that the administration [of US President Joe Biden] can take appropriate action if Russia uses a chemical. biological and/or nuclear weapons,— Kinzinger said.

He clarified that this resolution authorizes US President Joe Biden to use “forces to respond to a scenario” in which Russia uses any of these weapons.

“Having spoken to Secretary of State [Anthony] Blinken and listened to his serious concerns about [Russian President Vladimir] Putin's use of chemical weapons, I am confident that the United States will demonstrate to the world community that we will not tolerate senseless violence,”— added by Kinzinger.

Three days after the start of the military operation in Ukraine, Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered that the strategic deterrence forces (SSS) be placed on a special alert regime. These forces are designed to deter aggression against Russia and its allies in order to defeat the aggressor, including— in a nuclear war.

In March, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said he did not believe in a possible nuclear war. “I draw your attention to the fact that in the context of the events that have unfolded in Ukraine in recent years and have escalated literally in recent months and weeks, the nuclear topic has been thrown into this discourse exclusively by Western representatives, primarily NATO members,” — he said.

Read on RBC Pro Pro A strong HR brand: is it necessary to build it in conditions of turbulence Instructions Pro There is no salary in the vacancy: how to apply for the maximum at an interview Instructions Pro How national characteristics affect the management model – 6 indicators Articles Pro Two bad ones are better than zero good. How to look for rare IT candidates Instructions Pro How importers were able to protect themselves from the high volatility of the ruble Articles Pro When it is better to go on vacation so as not to lose money What will happen to the ruble exchange rate and inflationAt the end of April, Lavrov said that the risks of nuclear war are now very significant, and its danger should not be underestimated. At the same time, as the minister noted, Moscow's principled position is the thesis of the inadmissibility of nuclear war. US Ambassador John Sullivan called this statement by Lavrov “nuclear blackmail” that Washington will not fall for. before the start of the special operation, the US authorities stated that they would not do this. “In no way [development of events will American troops be sent to Ukraine]. If Americans and Russians start shooting at each other, it will be a world war, — Biden said on Feb. 10.

At the same time, in March, he announced the dispatch of the US military to Europe. “Our troops are heading to Europe not to fight in Ukraine, but to protect our NATO allies in case Putin decides to continue moving west,” the president explained. According to him, the hostilities in Ukraine, which is not part of NATO, do not require the direct participation of the United States.

Materials for the article Authors Tags Subscribe to RuTube RBC on our RuTube channel

Источник rbc.ru